Olympus 720UZ vs Olympus 620 UZ

Tie
Olympus SP-720UZ

33

Olympus SP-620 UZ

31

Tie

Reasons to buy the Olympus 720UZ

CMOS Sensor
Sensor type
Better in low light
In-camera HDR
HDR
Combines multiple exposures
In-camera panoramas
Panorama
Stitches together multiple photos into a panorama
Takes 3D photos
3D
View photos in 3D on 3D televisions
 

Reasons to buy the Olympus 620 UZ

Size
Really small
Mid size (106×69×40 mm)
Thickness
Thin
1.6"
Fastest shutter speed
Fast shutter speed
1/1500 of a second
Panorama
In-camera panoramas
Stitches together multiple photos into a panorama

galleries

Explore our gallery of 2 sample photos taken by the Olympus SP-620 UZ.
Explore our gallery of 2 sample photos taken by the Olympus SP-720UZ.

competitors

Olympus SP-720UZ Competitors

Nikon Coolpix L340

Nikon Coolpix L340

Super zoom

$196

Wide angle Much better wide angle
Aperture Slightly wider aperture
Image stabilization No image stabilization
Sony CyberShot DSC-H200

Sony CyberShot DSC-H200

Super zoom

$298

Wide angle Significantly better wide angle
Image stabilization Better image stabilization
3D Doesn't take 3D photos
Kodak PixPro AZ251

Kodak PixPro AZ251

Super zoom

$122 - $131

Image stabilization Better image stabilization
Wide angle Better wide angle
Fastest shutter speed Much slower max shutter speed

Olympus SP-620 UZ Competitors

Canon EOS M10

Canon EOS M10

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$816 body only

$449 with 15-45mm lens

Screen resolution Much higher resolution screen
Autofocus Faster autofocus
Lowest price More expensive
Nikon Coolpix L120

Nikon Coolpix L120

Super zoom

$405

Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Fastest shutter speed Significantly faster max shutter speed
3D Doesn't take 3D photos
Nikon Coolpix L820

Nikon Coolpix L820

Super zoom

$284

High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Size Larger

discussion

Olympus SP-720UZ
720UZ
Olympus

Report a correction
Olympus SP-620 UZ
620 UZ
Olympus

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments