Nikon D700 vs Nikon D80

Winner
Nikon D700

167

Nikon D80

87

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Nikon D700

Low noise at high ISO
Low light performance
2,303 ISO
Large viewfinder
Viewfinder size
0.72x
Has live view
Live view
Preview your photos
Barely any delay taking photos
Shutter lag
197 ms shutter lag
 

Reasons to buy the Nikon D80

Lens availability
Slightly more lenses available
230 lenses
Size
Really small
Professional size (132×103×77 mm)
Weight
Light-weight
668 g

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Nikon D700.
Explore our gallery of 49 sample photos taken by the Nikon D80.

competitors

Nikon D700 Competitors

Nikon D750

Nikon D750

Pro DSLR

$1,419 - $1,497 body only

$1,899 - $1,997 with 24-120mm lens

Screen size Significantly larger screen
True resolution Much higher true resolution
Viewfinder size Slightly smaller viewfinder
Nikon D7100

Nikon D7100

Entry-level DSLR

$719 body only

$1,097 with 18-55mm lens

Screen size Significantly larger screen
True resolution Much higher true resolution
Viewfinder size Significantly smaller viewfinder
Nikon D610

Nikon D610

Pro DSLR

$1,100 - $1,497 body only

$1,900 - $2,447 with 28-300mm lens

Screen size Significantly larger screen
True resolution Much higher true resolution
Viewfinder size Slightly smaller viewfinder

Nikon D80 Competitors

Nikon D7200

Nikon D7200

Entry-level DSLR

$749 - $797 body only

$1,097 with 18-140mm lens

Low light performance Much lower noise at high ISO
Overall image quality Much better image quality
Viewfinder size Slightly smaller viewfinder
Canon Rebel T3

Canon Rebel T3

Entry-level DSLR

$487 with 18-55mm lens

Live view Has live view
Screen size Significantly larger screen
Dynamic range Less dynamic range
Nikon D3200

Nikon D3200

Entry-level DSLR

$450 body only

Low light performance Much lower noise at high ISO
Overall image quality Much better image quality
Viewfinder Doesn't have a pentaprism viewfinder

discussion

Nikon D700
D700
Nikon

Report a correction
Nikon D80
D80
Nikon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments