Updated (February 2012): Compare the Nikon Coolpix S3100 vs Nikon Coolpix S9300

Nikon Coolpix S3100 vs Nikon Coolpix S9100

Winner
Nikon Coolpix S3100

52

Nikon Coolpix S9100

40

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Nikon Coolpix S3100

Really small
Size
Ultra compact (94×58×18 mm)
Thin
Thickness
0.7"
Light-weight
Weight
118 g
In-camera panoramas
Panorama
Stitches together multiple photos into a panorama
 

Reasons to buy the Nikon Coolpix S9100

Movie format
Full HD
1080p @ 30fps
Wide angle
Wide angle lens
25 mm
Screen resolution
High resolution screen
921k dots
High-speed framerate
High speed movies
240 fps

galleries

Explore our gallery of 38 sample photos taken by the Nikon Coolpix S3100.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Nikon Coolpix S9100.

differences

Advantages of the Nikon S3100

Report a correction
Size
Much smaller
94×58×18 mm vs 105×62×35 mm
Help
2.3x smaller
Aperture
Wider aperture
f/3.2 vs f/3.5
Help
At its widest zoom, the S3100's lens captures marginally more light (0.3 f-stops)
Thickness
Much thinner
0.7" vs 1.4"
Help
Around 50% thinner
Weight
Significantly lighter
118 g vs 214 g
Help
More than 40% lighter
Lowest price
Cheaper
$100.00 vs $264.50
Help
The best price we've seen is $165 cheaper (2.6x less)
Longest exposure
Slightly longer exposures
4s vs 1s
Help
4x longer exposures
Nikon Coolpix S3100 Learn more about
the Nikon S3100

Advantages of the Nikon S9100

Report a correction
Movie format
Higher resolution movies
1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps
Help
Shoots higher resolution Full HD (1080p) video
Screen resolution
Much higher resolution screen
921k dots vs 230k dots
Help
More than 4x higher resolution screen
High-speed framerate
Records high-speed movies
240 fps vs None
Help
Capture events too fast for the naked eye and play them back in super-slow motion
Macro focus
Much better macro capability
4.0 cm vs 10.0 cm
Help
Focus on subjects 2.5x closer to the lens
Screen size
Significantly larger screen
3" vs 2.7"
Help
More than 10% larger screen
Zoom
More zoom
18x vs 5x
Help
Around 13x more zoom
Continuous shooting
Shoots much faster
9.5 fps vs 0.7 fps
Help
More than 13.5x faster continuous shooting
Sensor type
Has a CMOS-family sensor
CMOS vs CCD
Help
CMOS-family sensors often produce better quality images
HDR
Has in-camera HDR
Yes vs No
Help
Combines multiple exposures to capture high dynamic range
Wide angle
Better wide angle
25 mm vs 26 mm
Help
Almost the same
Nikon Coolpix S9100 Learn more about
the Nikon S9100
vs

recommendations

Which camera do we recommend? Relative to the best recent compacts, and ignoring price

Snapsort Recommends
Nikon Coolpix S3100 Nikon Coolpix S3100 52
Retailer
    Style
      Color
        You save
        vs
        40 Nikon Coolpix S9100 Nikon Coolpix S9100
        Retailer
          Style
            Color
              You save

              similarities

              Compared to recent compacts

              Common Strengths
              Panorama In-camera panoramas Help
              Stitches together multiple photos into a panorama
              Common Weaknesses
              Longest exposure Short max exposure time Help
              S31004s
              S91001s
              Waterproof Not waterproof Help
              Stay on land
              Macro focus Poor macro capabilities Help
              S310010.0 cm
              S91004.0 cm
              Supports RAW No RAW support Help
              Less editing fidelity
              Light sensitivity Poor maximum light sensitivity Help
              3,200 ISO
              Screen flips out No flip-out screens Help
              Less flexible
              Image stabilization Poor image stabilization Help
              1. Sensor shift

              competitors

              Shared Competitors

              Advantages

              Disadvantages

              Nikon Coolpix S8100

              Nikon Coolpix S8100

              Travel zoom

              $298

              Image stabilization Has better image stabilization
              Macro focus Significantly closer macro focusing
              Lowest price Is slightly more expensive
              Thickness Is thicker
              Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10

              Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10

              Travel zoom

              $389

              Wide angle Has a slightly wider wide angle lens
              Image stabilization Has better image stabilization
              Lowest price Is significantly more expensive
              Thickness Is thicker

              Nikon Coolpix S3100 Competitors

              Advantages

              Disadvantages

              Nikon Coolpix S3300

              Nikon Coolpix S3300

              Compact

              $160

              Macro focus Much better macro capability
              Image stabilization Better image stabilization
              Panorama Lacks in-camera panoramic stitching
              Aperture Narrower aperture
              Canon PowerShot A3100 IS

              Canon PowerShot A3100 IS

              Compact

              $230

              Macro focus Much better macro capability
              Aperture Wider aperture
              Wide angle Much worse wide angle
              Movie format Lower resolution movies
              Nikon Coolpix S3000

              Nikon Coolpix S3000

              Compact

              $150

              Macro focus Significantly better macro capability
              Continuous shooting Shoots faster
              Movie format Lower resolution movies
              Panorama Lacks in-camera panoramic stitching
              Nikon Coolpix S2900

              Nikon Coolpix S2900

              Compact

              $113

              Image stabilization Worse image stabilization
              Size Slightly larger
              Canon PowerShot A2200

              Canon PowerShot A2200

              Compact

              $128

              Macro focus Much better macro capability
              Aperture Wider aperture
              Image stabilization No image stabilization
              Wide angle Worse wide angle

              Nikon Coolpix S9100 Competitors

              Advantages

              Disadvantages

              Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900

              Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900

              Ultra compact

              $260

              Screen size Much larger screen
              Size Much smaller
              Wide angle Much worse wide angle
              Movie format Lower resolution movies
              Olympus Stylus 9000

              Olympus Stylus 9000

              Travel zoom

              Macro focus Much better macro capability
              Size Smaller
              Movie format Lower resolution movies
              Screen resolution Much lower resolution screen
              Canon PowerShot SX230 HS

              Canon PowerShot SX230 HS

              Travel zoom

              $230

              Supports 24p Supports 24p
              Aperture Wider aperture
              Wide angle Significantly worse wide angle
              Screen resolution Significantly lower resolution screen
              Nikon Coolpix S9900

              Nikon Coolpix S9900

              Travel zoom

              $297

              Zoom Much more zoom
              Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
              High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
              Size Significantly larger
              Nikon Coolpix S9200

              Nikon Coolpix S9200

              Travel zoom

              3D Takes 3D photos
              Image stabilization Better image stabilization
              High-speed framerate Lower speed movies
              Battery life Significantly shorter battery life

              appearance

              Nikon Coolpix S3100 Nikon Coolpix S9100
              Nikon Coolpix S3100 Nikon Coolpix S9100
              Nikon Coolpix S3100 Nikon Coolpix S9100

              discussion

              Nikon Coolpix S3100
              Coolpix S3100
              Nikon

              Report a correction
              Nikon Coolpix S9100
              Coolpix S9100
              Nikon

              Report a correction

              Showing 0 comments