Nikon Coolpix S3300 vs Samsung ES55

Winner
Nikon Coolpix S3300

63

Samsung ES55

47

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Nikon Coolpix S3300

Really small
Size
Super compact (95×58×19 mm)
Thin
Thickness
0.7"
Light-weight
Weight
128 g
 

Reasons to buy the Samsung ES55

Weight
Light-weight
116 g
External flash
External flash
Better lighting
Size
Really small
Super compact (90×59×22 mm)
Thickness
Thin
0.9"

galleries

Explore our gallery of 37 sample photos taken by the Nikon Coolpix S3300.
Explore our gallery of 24 sample photos taken by the Samsung ES55.

competitors

Nikon Coolpix S3300 Competitors

Nikon Coolpix A300

Nikon Coolpix A300

Travel zoom

$99

Battery life Significantly longer battery life
Wide angle Better wide angle
Aperture Slightly narrower aperture
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX50

Sony Cyber-shot WX50

Ultra compact

$120

Sensor type Has a CMOS-family sensor
Aperture Wider aperture
Nikon Coolpix A100

Nikon Coolpix A100

Compact

$100

Battery life Significantly longer battery life
Aperture Wider aperture
Image stabilization Worse image stabilization

Samsung ES55 Competitors

Samsung SL202

Samsung SL202

Compact

Built-in flash Built-in flash
Screen size Larger screen
External flash No external flash support
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS12

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS12

Compact

$223

Built-in flash Built-in flash
Wide angle Significantly better wide angle
External flash No external flash support
Canon Digital IXUS 80 IS

Canon Digital IXUS 80 IS

Compact

Built-in flash Built-in flash
Image stabilization Better image stabilization
Wide angle Significantly worse wide angle

discussion

Nikon Coolpix S3300
Coolpix S3300
Nikon

Report a correction
Samsung ES55
ES55
Samsung

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments