Updated (August 2011): Compare the Nikon Coolpix P7100 vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5 vs Nikon Coolpix P7100

Winner
Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5

68

Nikon Coolpix P7100

64

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5

Great battery life
Battery life
400 shots
External flash
External flash
Better lighting
Fast shutter speed
Fastest shutter speed
1/4000 of a second
Long exposures
Longest exposure
60 seconds
 

Reasons to buy the Nikon Coolpix P7100

Screen resolution
High resolution screen
921k dots
External mic jack
External mic jack
Record higher quality audio with a microphone
Viewfinder
Great viewfinder
Tunnel
External flash
External flash
Better lighting

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Nikon Coolpix P7100.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5.

competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5 Competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX7

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX7

Pro digicam

$521

Sensor type Has a CMOS-family sensor
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Battery life Shorter battery life
Canon Powershot S100

Canon Powershot S100

Pro digicam

$500

Sensor type Has a CMOS-family sensor
GPS Has a GPS
Battery life Much shorter battery life
Canon PowerShot G7 X

Canon PowerShot G7 X

Pro digicam

$450

Sensor size Significantly larger sensor
Sensor type Has a CMOS-family sensor
Battery life Much shorter battery life

Nikon Coolpix P7100 Competitors

Canon PowerShot G12

Canon PowerShot G12

Pro digicam

$450

Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
Lowest price Cheaper
Screen size Much smaller screen
Fujifilm X30

Fujifilm X30

Pro digicam

$999

Sensor type Has a CMOS-family sensor
Aperture Wider aperture
External mic jack Lacks an external mic jack
Nikon Coolpix P900

Nikon Coolpix P900

Super zoom

$449 - $597

Zoom Much more zoom
Sensor type Has a CMOS-family sensor
Size Much larger

discussion

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5
Lumix DMC-LX5
Panasonic

Report a correction
Nikon Coolpix P7100
Coolpix P7100
Nikon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments