Nikon Coolpix P510 vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-G10

Winner
Nikon Coolpix P510

54

Panasonic Lumix DMC-G10

27

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Nikon Coolpix P510

High speed movies
High-speed framerate
120 fps
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Lens
In-camera HDR
HDR
Combines multiple exposures
In-camera panoramas
Panorama
Stitches together multiple photos into a panorama
 

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix DMC-G10

Color depth
Great color depth
21.2 bits
Thickness
Thin
2.9"
Weight
Light-weight
381 g
Supports RAW
Shoots RAW
Better editing

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Nikon Coolpix P510.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Panasonic Lumix DMC-G10.

competitors

Nikon Coolpix P510 Competitors

Nikon Coolpix P520

Nikon Coolpix P520

Super zoom

$380

Macro focus Much better macro capability
Screen size Significantly larger screen
Shutter lag More shutter lag
Nikon Coolpix B500

Nikon Coolpix B500

Super zoom

$257

Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
Battery life Longer battery life
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Nikon Coolpix L840

Nikon Coolpix L840

Super zoom

$188 - $229

Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
Battery life Longer battery life
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

Panasonic Lumix DMC-G10 Competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-G7

Panasonic Lumix DMC-G7

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$500 body only

$798 with 14-42mm lens

Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Touch screen Has a touch screen
Weight Slightly heavier
Panasonic Lumix DMC-G2

Panasonic Lumix DMC-G2

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$648 with 14-42mm lens

3D Takes 3D photos
Touch screen Has a touch screen
Weight Slightly heavier
Panasonic Lumix DMC-G5

Panasonic Lumix DMC-G5

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$300 body only

$450 with 14-42mm lens

Image stabilization Image stabilization
3D Takes 3D photos

discussion

Nikon Coolpix P510
Coolpix P510
Nikon

Report a correction
Panasonic Lumix DMC-G10
Lumix DMC-G10
Panasonic

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments