Nikon Coolpix P510 vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-G10

Winner
Nikon Coolpix P510

47

Panasonic Lumix DMC-G10

26

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Nikon Coolpix P510

In-camera HDR
HDR
Combines multiple exposures
In-camera panoramas
Panorama
Stitches together multiple photos into a panorama
Takes 3D photos
3D
View photos in 3D on 3D televisions
Barely any delay taking photos
Shutter lag
380 ms shutter lag
 

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix DMC-G10

Overall image quality
Great image quality
52.0
Color depth
Great color depth
21.2 bits
Movie continuous focus
Movie continuous focus
Makes it easy to get in-focus movies
Thickness
Thin
2.9"

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Nikon Coolpix P510.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Panasonic Lumix DMC-G10.

competitors

Nikon Coolpix P510 Competitors

Nikon Coolpix P610

Nikon Coolpix P610

Super zoom

$290 - $427

Zoom Significantly more zoom
Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
Aperture Narrower aperture
Nikon Coolpix L840

Nikon Coolpix L840

Super zoom

$159 - $197

Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
Battery life Longer battery life
GPS No built-in GPS
Nikon Coolpix P530

Nikon Coolpix P530

Super zoom

$277

Macro focus Better macro capability
Weight Slightly lighter
3D Doesn't take 3D photos

Panasonic Lumix DMC-G10 Competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-G3

Panasonic Lumix DMC-G3

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$359 body only

3D Takes 3D photos
Touch screen Has a touch screen
Color depth Worse color depth
Panasonic Lumix DMC-G2

Panasonic Lumix DMC-G2

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$322 body only

3D Takes 3D photos
Touch screen Has a touch screen
Weight Slightly heavier
Panasonic Lumix DMC-G7

Panasonic Lumix DMC-G7

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$460 body only

$580 - $598 with 14-42mm lens

Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Touch screen Has a touch screen
Weight Slightly heavier

discussion

Nikon Coolpix P510
Coolpix P510
Nikon

Report a correction
Panasonic Lumix DMC-G10
Lumix DMC-G10
Panasonic

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments