Nikon Coolpix P510 vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-G10

Winner
Nikon Coolpix P510

49

Panasonic Lumix DMC-G10

27

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Nikon Coolpix P510

Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Lens
In-camera HDR
HDR
Combines multiple exposures
In-camera panoramas
Panorama
Stitches together multiple photos into a panorama
Takes 3D photos
3D
View photos in 3D on 3D televisions
 

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix DMC-G10

Size
Really small
Prosumer size (124×90×74 mm)
Thickness
Thin
2.9"
Weight
Light-weight
381 g
Supports RAW
Shoots RAW
Better editing

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Nikon Coolpix P510.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Panasonic Lumix DMC-G10.

competitors

Nikon Coolpix P510 Competitors

Nikon Coolpix P610

Nikon Coolpix P610

Super zoom

$340 - $399

Zoom Significantly more zoom
Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
Aperture Narrower aperture
Nikon Coolpix P530

Nikon Coolpix P530

Super zoom

$179 - $279

Macro focus Better macro capability
Weight Slightly lighter
3D Doesn't take 3D photos
Nikon Coolpix P520

Nikon Coolpix P520

Super zoom

$325

Screen size Larger screen
Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
Shutter lag More shutter lag

Panasonic Lumix DMC-G10 Competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-G6

Panasonic Lumix DMC-G6

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$433 body only

$540 with 14-42mm lens

Image stabilization Image stabilization
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX7

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX7

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$510 body only

$685 with 14-42mm lens

Overall image quality Significantly better image quality
Image stabilization Image stabilization
Sensor type Has a CCD-family sensor
Panasonic Lumix DMC-G2

Panasonic Lumix DMC-G2

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$724 with 14-42mm lens

3D Takes 3D photos
Touch screen Has a touch screen
Weight Slightly heavier

discussion

Nikon Coolpix P510
Coolpix P510
Nikon

Report a correction
Panasonic Lumix DMC-G10
Lumix DMC-G10
Panasonic

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments