Updated (January 2013): Compare the Nikon Coolpix P520 vs Olympus XZ-1

Olympus XZ-1 vs Nikon Coolpix P510

Tie
Olympus XZ-1

42

Nikon Coolpix P510

40

Tie

Reasons to buy the Olympus XZ-1

Wide aperture
Aperture
f/1.8
Really small
Size
Mid size (111×65×42 mm)
OLED Screen
Screen type
Bright and vivid
Thin
Thickness
1.7"
 

Reasons to buy the Nikon Coolpix P510

Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Lens
HDR
In-camera HDR
Combines multiple exposures
3D
Takes 3D photos
View photos in 3D on 3D televisions
GPS
Built-in GPS
Great for travel

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Nikon Coolpix P510.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Olympus XZ-1.

differences

Advantages of the Nikon P510

Report a correction
3D
Takes 3D photos
Yes vs No
Help
Combines multiple photos into a 3D image
Zoom
Significantly more zoom
41.7x vs 4x
Help
More than 108.5x more zoom
Wide angle
Better wide angle
24 mm vs 28 mm
Help
More than 10% better wide angle
Sensor type
Has a CMOS-family sensor
CMOS vs CCD
Help
CMOS-family sensors often produce better quality images
Movie format
Higher resolution movies
1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps
Help
Shoots higher resolution Full HD (1080p) video
HDR
Has in-camera HDR
Yes vs No
Help
Combines multiple exposures to capture high dynamic range
Screen resolution
Higher resolution screen
921k dots vs 614k dots
Help
50% higher resolution screen
GPS
Has a GPS
Yes vs No
Help
Automatically geotags your photos when traveling
Image stabilization
Better image stabilization
  1. Lens
vs
  1. Sensor shift
Help
Less risk of blur
High-speed framerate
Records high-speed movies
120 fps vs None
Help
Capture events too fast for the naked eye and play them back in super-slow motion
Viewfinder
Has a viewfinder
Digital vs None
Help
A viewfinder can help save battery life by keeping the screen turned off
Fastest shutter speed
Significantly faster max shutter speed
1/4000s vs 1/2000s
Help
2x faster max shutter speed
Nikon Coolpix P510 Learn more about
the Nikon P510

Advantages of the Olympus XZ-1

Report a correction
Aperture
Much wider aperture
f/1.8 vs f/3
Help
At its widest zoom, the XZ-1's lens captures much more light (1.5 f-stops)
Screen type
Has an OLED screen
OLED vs LCD
Help
OLED screens are often brighter and more vibrant than typical LCD screens
Size
Significantly smaller
111×65×42 mm vs 120×83×102 mm
Help
3.4x smaller
Battery life
Significantly longer battery life
320 shots vs 200 shots
Help
60% more shots per battery charge
Supports RAW
Shoots RAW
Yes vs No
Help
Digitally develop your own photos with precise image control
Sensor size
Larger sensor
1/1.6" 8.3x6.2mm vs 1/2.3" 6.17x4.55mm
Help
More than 80% larger sensor
Thickness
Significantly thinner
1.7" vs 4"
Help
2.4x thinner
Light sensitivity
Better maximum light sensitivity
6,400 ISO vs 3,200 ISO
Help
The XZ-1's maximum light sensitivity is 2 f-stops better
Weight
Significantly lighter
275 g vs 555 g
Help
2x lighter
External flash
Supports an external flash
Yes vs No
Help
An external flash often produces better looking flash images
Macro focus
Better macro capability
1.0 cm vs 2.0 cm
Help
Focus on subjects 2x closer to the lens
Longest exposure
Significantly longer exposures
60s vs 8s
Help
7.5x longer exposures
Lowest price
Cheaper
$206.00 vs $475.00
Help
The best price we've seen is $269 cheaper (2.3x less)
True resolution
Slightly higher true resolution
10 MP vs 9.7 MP
Help
Almost the same
Olympus XZ-1 Learn more about
the Olympus XZ-1
vs

recommendations

Which camera do we recommend? Relative to the best recent digicams, and ignoring price

Nikon Coolpix P510 Nikon Coolpix P510 40
Retailer
    Style
      Color
        You save
        vs
        42 Olympus XZ-1 Olympus XZ-1
        Retailer
          Style
            Color
              You save

              similarities

              Compared to recent digicams

              Common Strengths
              Panorama In-camera panoramas Help
              Stitches together multiple photos into a panorama
              Common Weaknesses
              Waterproof Not waterproof Help
              Stay on land
              Screen flips out No flip-out screens Help
              Less flexible

              dxomark

              DXOMark

              competitors

              Shared Competitors

              Advantages

              Disadvantages

              No significant shared competitors found.

              Nikon Coolpix P510 Competitors

              Advantages

              Disadvantages

              Canon PowerShot SX50 HS

              Canon PowerShot SX50 HS

              Super zoom

              $329 - $349

              Supports 24p Supports 24p
              Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
              3D Doesn't take 3D photos
              Screen resolution Significantly lower resolution screen
              Nikon Coolpix P530

              Nikon Coolpix P530

              Super zoom

              $297

              Macro focus Better macro capability
              Battery life Longer battery life
              3D Doesn't take 3D photos
              GPS No built-in GPS
              Nikon Coolpix P520

              Nikon Coolpix P520

              Super zoom

              $276

              Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
              Screen size Larger screen
              Shutter lag Much more shutter lag
              Size Slightly larger
              Nikon D3200

              Nikon D3200

              Entry-level DSLR

              $289 body only

              $447 with 18-55mm lens

              True resolution Much higher true resolution
              Autofocus Faster autofocus
              Image stabilization No image stabilization
              3D Doesn't take 3D photos
              Nikon Coolpix P600

              Nikon Coolpix P600

              Super zoom

              $335

              Zoom Significantly more zoom
              Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
              3D Doesn't take 3D photos
              Aperture Narrower aperture

              Olympus XZ-1 Competitors

              Advantages

              Disadvantages

              Olympus XZ-2 iHS

              Olympus XZ-2 iHS

              Pro digicam

              Overall image quality Better image quality
              Touch screen Has a touch screen
              Screen type Doesn't have an OLED screen
              Sensor size Smaller sensor
              Olympus Stylus XZ-10

              Olympus Stylus XZ-10

              Pro digicam

              $166

              Touch screen Has a touch screen
              Sensor type Has a CMOS-family sensor
              Screen type Doesn't have an OLED screen
              Battery life Shorter battery life
              Canon Powershot S100

              Canon Powershot S100

              Pro digicam

              $330

              Overall image quality Better image quality
              Supports 24p Supports 24p
              Screen type Doesn't have an OLED screen
              Panorama Lacks in-camera panoramic stitching
              Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100

              Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100

              Pro digicam

              $448 - $498

              Overall image quality Much better image quality
              True resolution Much higher true resolution
              Screen type Doesn't have an OLED screen
              Macro focus Much worse macro capability
              Canon PowerShot S95

              Canon PowerShot S95

              Pro digicam

              $399

              Supports 24p Supports 24p
              Overall image quality Better image quality
              Screen type Doesn't have an OLED screen
              Macro focus Much worse macro capability

              appearance

              Nikon Coolpix P510 Olympus XZ-1
              Nikon Coolpix P510 Olympus XZ-1
              Nikon Coolpix P510 Olympus XZ-1

              discussion

              Nikon Coolpix P510
              Coolpix P510
              Nikon

              Report a correction
              Olympus XZ-1
              XZ-1
              Olympus

              Report a correction

              Showing 0 comments