Updated (February 2012): Compare the Nikon Coolpix P510 vs Nikon D7000

Nikon D7000 vs Nikon Coolpix P510

Tie
Nikon D7000

51

Nikon Coolpix P510

51

Tie

Reasons to buy the Nikon D7000

Weather sealed
Weather sealed
Shoot in extreme weather
Wide dynamic range
Dynamic range
13.9 EV
Great viewfinder coverage
Viewfinder coverage
100%
Movie continuous focus
Movie continuous focus
Makes it easy to get in-focus movies
 

Reasons to buy the Nikon Coolpix P510

High-speed framerate
High speed movies
120 fps
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Lens
HDR
In-camera HDR
Combines multiple exposures
Panorama
In-camera panoramas
Stitches together multiple photos into a panorama

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Nikon Coolpix P510.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Nikon D7000.

competitors

Nikon D7000 Competitors

Nikon D7200

Nikon D7200

Entry-level DSLR

$849 - $1,047 body only

$1,347 with 18-140mm lens

Screen size Larger screen
HDR Has in-camera HDR
Movie continuous focus Doesn't focus continuously recording movies
Nikon D7100

Nikon D7100

Entry-level DSLR

$627 - $797 body only

$970 - $1,097 with 18-140mm lens

Screen size Larger screen
HDR Has in-camera HDR
Battery life Slightly shorter battery life
Nikon D5300

Nikon D5300

Entry-level DSLR

$437 - $497 body only

$525 - $597 with 18-55mm lens

Screen size Larger screen
HDR Has in-camera HDR
Viewfinder coverage Much less viewfinder coverage

Nikon Coolpix P510 Competitors

Nikon Coolpix P520

Nikon Coolpix P520

Super zoom

$300

Screen size Larger screen
Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
Shutter lag More shutter lag
Nikon Coolpix P530

Nikon Coolpix P530

Super zoom

$226

Macro focus Better macro capability
Weight Slightly lighter
3D Doesn't take 3D photos
Nikon Coolpix P610

Nikon Coolpix P610

Super zoom

$420

Zoom Significantly more zoom
Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
Aperture Narrower aperture

discussion

Nikon D7000
D7000
Nikon

Report a correction
Nikon Coolpix P510
Coolpix P510
Nikon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments