Updated (February 2012): Compare the Nikon Coolpix P510 vs Nikon Coolpix P7000

Nikon Coolpix P7000 vs Nikon Coolpix P510

Winner
Nikon Coolpix P7000

42

Nikon Coolpix P510

39

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Nikon Coolpix P7000

Really small
Size
Mid size (114×77×45 mm)
24p movies
Supports 24p
For that film look
External mic jack
External mic jack
Record higher quality audio with a microphone
Thin
Thickness
1.8"
 

Reasons to buy the Nikon Coolpix P510

High-speed framerate
High speed movies
120 fps
Sensor type
CMOS Sensor
Better in low light
GPS
Built-in GPS
Great for travel
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Lens

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Nikon Coolpix P510.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Nikon Coolpix P7000.

competitors

Nikon Coolpix P7000 Competitors

Nikon Coolpix P900

Nikon Coolpix P900

Super zoom

$499 - $597

Zoom Much more zoom
Wide angle Significantly better wide angle
Size Much larger
Nikon Coolpix P7100

Nikon Coolpix P7100

Pro digicam

$480

Overall image quality Better image quality
Low light performance Lower noise at high ISO
Supports 24p No 24p support
Canon PowerShot G12

Canon PowerShot G12

Pro digicam

$644

Overall image quality Much better image quality
Dynamic range More dynamic range
External mic jack Lacks an external mic jack

Nikon Coolpix P510 Competitors

Nikon Coolpix B500

Nikon Coolpix B500

Super zoom

$215 - $257

Battery life Much longer battery life
Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Nikon Coolpix L840

Nikon Coolpix L840

Super zoom

$179 - $199

Battery life Much longer battery life
Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Nikon Coolpix P520

Nikon Coolpix P520

Super zoom

$384

Screen size Significantly larger screen
Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
Size Slightly larger

discussion

Nikon Coolpix P7000
Coolpix P7000
Nikon

Report a correction
Nikon Coolpix P510
Coolpix P510
Nikon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments