Updated (February 2012): Compare the Nikon Coolpix P510 vs Nikon Coolpix S9300

Nikon Coolpix P510 vs Nikon Coolpix S9300

Winner
Nikon Coolpix P510

38

Nikon Coolpix S9300

35

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Nikon Coolpix P510

Great viewfinder
Viewfinder
Digital
High speed movies
High-speed framerate
120 fps
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Lens
In-camera panoramas
Panorama
Stitches together multiple photos into a panorama
 

Reasons to buy the Nikon Coolpix S9300

Size
Really small
Compact (109×62×31 mm)
Thickness
Thin
1.2"
Weight
Light-weight
215 g
High-speed framerate
High speed movies
120 fps

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Nikon Coolpix P510.
Explore our gallery of 3 sample photos taken by the Nikon Coolpix S9300.

competitors

Nikon Coolpix P510 Competitors

Nikon Coolpix P900

Nikon Coolpix P900

Super zoom

$499 - $597

Zoom Much more zoom
Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Nikon Coolpix B700

Nikon Coolpix B700

Super zoom

$414 - $447

Zoom Significantly more zoom
Movie format Higher resolution movies
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Nikon Coolpix P520

Nikon Coolpix P520

Super zoom

$384

Screen size Significantly larger screen
Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
Size Slightly larger

Nikon Coolpix S9300 Competitors

Nikon Coolpix S7000

Nikon Coolpix S7000

Travel zoom

$169 - $227

Aperture Slightly wider aperture
Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Sony Cyber-Shot HX60

Sony Cyber-Shot HX60

Travel zoom

$247 - $304

Wide angle Much better wide angle
Zoom More zoom
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Nikon Coolpix S9500

Nikon Coolpix S9500

Travel zoom

$230

High-speed framerate Higher speed movies
Screen type Has an OLED screen
Screen resolution Lower resolution screen

discussion

Nikon Coolpix P510
Coolpix P510
Nikon

Report a correction
Nikon Coolpix S9300
Coolpix S9300
Nikon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments