Updated (February 2011): Compare the Nikon Coolpix P500 vs Nikon Coolpix S9100

Nikon Coolpix P500 vs Nikon Coolpix S9100

Winner
Nikon Coolpix P500

35

Nikon Coolpix S9100

33

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Nikon Coolpix P500

Flip-out screen
Screen flips out
Great for movies
Great viewfinder
Viewfinder
Digital
Fast shutter speed
Fastest shutter speed
1/5000 of a second
High speed movies
High-speed framerate
240 fps
 

Reasons to buy the Nikon Coolpix S9100

Size
Really small
Compact (105×62×35 mm)
Thickness
Thin
1.4"
Weight
Light-weight
214 g
High-speed framerate
High speed movies
240 fps

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Nikon Coolpix P500.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Nikon Coolpix S9100.

competitors

Nikon Coolpix P500 Competitors

Nikon Coolpix B500

Nikon Coolpix B500

Super zoom

$215 - $257

Battery life Much longer battery life
Aperture Wider aperture
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Nikon Coolpix B700

Nikon Coolpix B700

Super zoom

$394 - $447

Zoom Much more zoom
Movie format Higher resolution movies
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Nikon Coolpix L340

Nikon Coolpix L340

Super zoom

$170 - $177

Wide angle Much better wide angle
Battery life Much longer battery life
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

Nikon Coolpix S9100 Competitors

Nikon Coolpix S8100

Nikon Coolpix S8100

Travel zoom

$145

Image stabilization Better image stabilization
Fastest shutter speed Much faster max shutter speed
Wide angle Much worse wide angle
Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100

Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100

Pro digicam

$448

Aperture Much wider aperture
Image stabilization Better image stabilization
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Nikon Coolpix S9300

Nikon Coolpix S9300

Travel zoom

$349

GPS Has a GPS
Image stabilization Better image stabilization
High-speed framerate Lower speed movies

discussion

Nikon Coolpix P500
Coolpix P500
Nikon

Report a correction
Nikon Coolpix S9100
Coolpix S9100
Nikon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments