Updated (February 2011): Compare the Nikon Coolpix P500 vs Nikon Coolpix S9100

Nikon Coolpix P500 vs Nikon Coolpix S9100

Winner
Nikon Coolpix P500

61

Nikon Coolpix S9100

53

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Nikon Coolpix P500

Flip-out screen
Screen flips out
Great for movies
Fast shutter speed
Fastest shutter speed
1/5000 of a second
High resolution screen
Screen resolution
920k dots
High speed movies
High-speed framerate
240 fps
 

Reasons to buy the Nikon Coolpix S9100

Screen resolution
High resolution screen
921k dots
Size
Really small
Compact (105×62×35 mm)
Thickness
Thin
1.4"
Weight
Light-weight
214 g

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Nikon Coolpix P500.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Nikon Coolpix S9100.

competitors

Nikon Coolpix P500 Competitors

Nikon Coolpix B500

Nikon Coolpix B500

Super zoom

$199 - $257

Battery life Much longer battery life
Aperture Wider aperture
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon PowerShot SX60 HS

Canon PowerShot SX60 HS

Super zoom

$378 - $449

Zoom Much more zoom
External mic jack Has an external mic jack
Size Larger
Sony Cyber-Shot DSC-HX300

Sony Cyber-Shot DSC-HX300

Super zoom

$550

Aperture Wider aperture
Zoom More zoom
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

Nikon Coolpix S9100 Competitors

Nikon Coolpix S8100

Nikon Coolpix S8100

Travel zoom

$499

Image stabilization Better image stabilization
Fastest shutter speed Significantly faster max shutter speed
Wide angle Significantly worse wide angle
Canon PowerShot SX620 HS

Canon PowerShot SX620 HS

Travel zoom

$218 - $249

Image stabilization Better image stabilization
Aperture Wider aperture
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Nikon Coolpix P300

Nikon Coolpix P300

Pro digicam

$380

Aperture Much wider aperture
Image stabilization Better image stabilization
High-speed framerate Lower speed movies

discussion

Nikon Coolpix P500
Coolpix P500
Nikon

Report a correction
Nikon Coolpix S9100
Coolpix S9100
Nikon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments