Updated (February 2012): Compare the Nikon Coolpix P500 vs Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V vs Nikon Coolpix P500

Tie
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V

100

Nikon Coolpix P500

100

Tie

Reasons to buy the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V

High resolution screen
Screen resolution
921k dots
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Lens
Great battery life
Battery life
450 shots
Built-in GPS
GPS
Great for travel
 

Reasons to buy the Nikon Coolpix P500

High-speed framerate
High speed movies
240 fps
Screen flips out
Flip-out screen
Great for movies
Fastest shutter speed
Fast shutter speed
1/5000 of a second
Screen resolution
High resolution screen
920k dots

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Nikon Coolpix P500.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V.

competitors

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V Competitors

Nikon Coolpix B500

Nikon Coolpix B500

Super zoom

$199 - $257

Battery life Much longer battery life
Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
GPS No built-in GPS
Sony CyberShot DSC-H300

Sony CyberShot DSC-H300

Super zoom

$178 - $212

Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
Sensor type Has a CCD-family sensor
Nikon Coolpix L340

Nikon Coolpix L340

Super zoom

$229

Wide angle Much better wide angle
Battery life Much longer battery life
Image stabilization No image stabilization

Nikon Coolpix P500 Competitors

Nikon Coolpix B500

Nikon Coolpix B500

Super zoom

$199 - $257

Battery life Much longer battery life
Aperture Wider aperture
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon PowerShot SX60 HS

Canon PowerShot SX60 HS

Super zoom

$330 - $449

Zoom Much more zoom
External mic jack Has an external mic jack
Size Larger
Sony Cyber-Shot DSC-HX300

Sony Cyber-Shot DSC-HX300

Super zoom

$550

Aperture Wider aperture
Zoom More zoom
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

discussion

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V
Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V
Sony

Report a correction
Nikon Coolpix P500
Coolpix P500
Nikon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments