 Snapsort Recommends | ||||||||||||||||||||
You save | vs |
You save |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
differences
Advantages of the Nikon P500
Report a correction 
1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps
23 mm vs 28 mm
920k dots vs 460k dots
36x vs 15x
CMOS vs CCD
Yes vs No
Yes vs No
240 fps vs None
10 fps vs 1 fps
Digital vs None
3,200 ISO vs 1,600 ISO
1/5000s vs 1/2000s
 | Learn more about the Nikon P500 |
Advantages of the Nikon L110
Report a correction 
Yes vs No
109x74x78 mm vs 116x84x103 mm
6,400 ISO vs None
3.1" vs 4.1"
406 g vs 481 g
$309.99 vs $350.00
8s vs 2s
 | Learn more about the Nikon L110 |
recommendations
Which camera do we recommend? Relative to the best recent super zooms, and ignoring price
similarities
Compared to recent digicams
Common Strengths
 | Good macro capabilities |
| 1 cm |
Common Weaknesses
| Quite thick | |||
|
| Heavy | |||
|
| One has boost ISO | |||
|
 | No RAW support |
| Less editing fidelity |
 | Neither has in-camera HDR |
| You could do HDR manually |
| Poor maximum light sensitivity | |||
|
| Large | |||
|
 | Very narrow widest aperture size |
| f/3.5 |
Compared to recent super zooms
Common Strengths
Snapsort is not aware of any interesting strengths shared by these two products.
Common Weaknesses
 | No external flash support |
| Less expandable |
 | Poor image stabilization |
| Sensor shift |
 | No support for 24p |
| Missing that film look |
| Poor zoom | |||
|
competitors
Shared Competitors
Advantages
Disadvantages
Nikon Coolpix L830
Super zoom
$194 - $297
| Has a slightly wider aperture |
| Has better image stabilization |
| Has a slower max shutter speed |
| Is slightly heavier |
Nikon Coolpix P100
Super zoom
$321
| Has a slightly wider aperture |
| Has a slower max shutter speed |
| Is thicker |
Nikon D3200
Entry-level DSLR
$309 - $527 body only
$443 - $447 with 18-55mm lens
 | Takes much higher resolution photos |
| Slightly higher maximum light sensitivity |
| Is slightly heavier |
| Doesn't have image stabilization |
Nikon Coolpix L820
Super zoom
$149 - $270
| Has a slightly wider aperture |
| Has better image stabilization |
| Has a slower max shutter speed |
Nikon Coolpix L810
Super zoom
$310
| Has a slightly wider aperture |
| Has better image stabilization |
| Has a slower max shutter speed |
 | Has much more shutter lag |
Nikon Coolpix P520
Super zoom
$438
| Has a slightly wider aperture |
 | Has a slightly larger screen |
| Is slightly more expensive |
| Is thicker |
Canon Rebel T3
Entry-level DSLR
$349 - $380 body only
$389 - $399 with 18-55mm lens
| Takes slightly higher resolution photos |
| Slightly higher maximum light sensitivity |
| Has slightly more shutter lag |
| Doesn't have image stabilization |
Nikon Coolpix P500 Competitors
Advantages
Disadvantages
Nikon Coolpix P510
Super zoom
$500
 | Takes 3D photos |
| Wider aperture |
| Screen does not flip out |
| Lower speed movies |
Canon Powershot SX40
Super zoom
$405
| Significantly wider aperture |
| Supports 24p |
| Much lower resolution screen |
| Lacks in-camera panoramic stitching |
Nikon D3100
Entry-level DSLR
$240 - $280 body only
$389 - $410 with 18-55mm lens
 | Faster autofocus |
| Supports 24p |
| No image stabilization |
| Much lower resolution screen |
Nikon Coolpix P600
Super zoom
$320 - $397
| Much more zoom |
| Has in-camera HDR |
| Lower speed movies |
| Slightly worse wide angle |
Sony Cybershot DSC-HX100v
Super zoom
$429
| Wider aperture |
 | Much longer battery life |
| Worse wide angle |
| Screen does not flip out |
Nikon Coolpix L110 Competitors
Advantages
Disadvantages
Nikon Coolpix L310
Super zoom
| Wider aperture |
| Better wide angle |
| Much worse macro capability |
| Lacks an external mic jack |
Nikon Coolpix P90
Super zoom
$450
| Wider aperture |
| Has a flip-out screen |
| Lacks an external mic jack |
| Lower resolution movies |
Nikon Coolpix L320
Super zoom
$249
| Significantly better wide angle |
| Wider aperture |
| Lacks an external mic jack |
| Lower resolution screen |
appearance
 |  |
 |  |
 |  |
discussion
Coolpix P500
Nikon
Report a correction Coolpix L110
Nikon
Report a correction
Showing 0 comments