Updated (February 2012): Compare the Nikon Coolpix P310 vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ20

Nikon Coolpix P310 vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ20

Nikon Coolpix P310
Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ20

Reasons to buy the Nikon Coolpix P310

Wide aperture
Aperture
f/1.8
In-camera HDR
HDR
Combines multiple exposures
In-camera panoramas
Panorama
Stitches together multiple photos into a panorama
Takes 3D photos
3D
View photos in 3D on 3D televisions
 

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ20

High-speed framerate
High speed movies
220 fps
Touch screen
Touch screen
Fewer buttons
GPS
Built-in GPS
Great for travel
Fastest shutter speed
Fast shutter speed
1/4000 of a second

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Nikon Coolpix P310.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ20.

competitors

Nikon Coolpix P310 Competitors

Canon PowerShot SX620 HS

Canon PowerShot SX620 HS

Travel zoom

$279

Zoom Much more zoom
Size Smaller
Focus points Many fewer focus points
Nikon Coolpix P330

Nikon Coolpix P330

Pro digicam

$339

Supports RAW Shoots RAW
GPS Has a GPS
HDR Lacks in-camera HDR
Nikon Coolpix P340

Nikon Coolpix P340

Pro digicam

$249

High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies
Supports RAW Shoots RAW
3D Doesn't take 3D photos

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ20 Competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS60 (Lumix DMC-TZ80)

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS60 (Lumix DMC-TZ80)

Travel zoom

Movie format Higher resolution movies
Continuous shooting Shoots much faster
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ70

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ70

Travel zoom

$298

Zoom Much more zoom
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ60

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ60

Travel zoom

$251

Zoom Much more zoom
3D Takes 3D photos
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

discussion

Nikon Coolpix P310
Coolpix P310
Nikon

Report a correction
Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ20
Lumix DMC-TZ20
Panasonic

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments