Updated (February 2012): Compare the Nikon Coolpix P310 vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ20

Nikon Coolpix P310 vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ20

Nikon Coolpix P310
Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ20

Reasons to buy the Nikon Coolpix P310

Wide aperture
Aperture
f/1.8
In-camera HDR
HDR
Combines multiple exposures
Takes 3D photos
3D
View photos in 3D on 3D televisions
Many focus points
Focus points
99
 

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ20

High-speed framerate
High speed movies
220 fps
Touch screen
Touch screen
Fewer buttons
GPS
Built-in GPS
Great for travel
Fastest shutter speed
Fast shutter speed
1/4000 of a second

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Nikon Coolpix P310.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ20.

competitors

Nikon Coolpix P310 Competitors

Nikon Coolpix P340

Nikon Coolpix P340

Pro digicam

$299

High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies
Supports RAW Shoots RAW
3D Doesn't take 3D photos
Nikon Coolpix P300

Nikon Coolpix P300

Pro digicam

$340

High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies
Continuous shooting Shoots faster
3D Doesn't take 3D photos
Nikon Coolpix P330

Nikon Coolpix P330

Pro digicam

$330

GPS Has a GPS
Supports RAW Shoots RAW
HDR Lacks in-camera HDR

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ20 Competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS100 (Lumix DMC-TZ100)

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS100 (Lumix DMC-TZ100)

Travel zoom

Continuous shooting Shoots much faster
Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ30

Panasonic Lumix TZ30

Travel zoom

$286

3D Takes 3D photos
Panorama Can create panoramas in-camera
Longest exposure Much shorter max exposures
Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ70

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ70

Travel zoom

$367

Zoom Significantly more zoom
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

discussion

Nikon Coolpix P310
Coolpix P310
Nikon

Report a correction
Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ20
Lumix DMC-TZ20
Panasonic

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments