Updated (February 2012): Compare the Nikon Coolpix L810 vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ100

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ100 vs Nikon Coolpix L810

Tie
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ100

46

Nikon Coolpix L810

46

Tie

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ100

High speed movies
High-speed framerate
220 fps
Flip-out screen
Screen flips out
Great for movies
CMOS Sensor
Sensor type
Better in low light
Great viewfinder
Viewfinder
Digital
 

Reasons to buy the Nikon Coolpix L810

Screen resolution
High resolution screen
921k dots
Size
Really small
Prosumer size (111×76×83 mm)
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Lens

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Nikon Coolpix L810.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ100.

competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ100 Competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ70

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ70

Super zoom

$250

Zoom Much more zoom
Wide angle Much better wide angle
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200

Super zoom

$397

External mic jack Has an external mic jack
High-speed framerate Higher speed movies
Size Larger
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 (Lumix DMC-FZ2000)

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 (Lumix DMC-FZ2000)

Super zoom

External mic jack Has an external mic jack
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Size Significantly larger

Nikon Coolpix L810 Competitors

Nikon Coolpix L820

Nikon Coolpix L820

Super zoom

$199

High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies
Sensor type Has a CMOS-family sensor
Weight Slightly heavier
Nikon Coolpix B500

Nikon Coolpix B500

Super zoom

$215 - $257

Battery life Much longer battery life
Zoom More zoom
Size Slightly larger
Nikon Coolpix L340

Nikon Coolpix L340

Super zoom

$170 - $177

Wide angle Much better wide angle
Battery life Much longer battery life
Image stabilization No image stabilization

discussion

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ100
Lumix DMC-FZ100
Panasonic

Report a correction
Nikon Coolpix L810
Coolpix L810
Nikon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments