Updated (February, 2012): Compare the Nikon Coolpix L810 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ

Nikon Coolpix L120

Winner
Nikon Coolpix L120

55

vs

Olympus SP-610 UZ

51

Olympus SP-610 UZ

Runner-up
     
 

Reasons to buy the Nikon Coolpix L120

Screen resolution
High resolution screen
920k dots
 

Reasons to buy the Olympus SP-610 UZ

We are not aware of any reasons to consider buying the Olympus SP-610 UZ over the Nikon Coolpix L120.
 
Differences | Recommendations | Cast your vote | Similarities | Competitors | Appearance | Discussion

differences

Advantages of the Nikon L120

Report a correction
Screen resolution Much higher resolution screen 920k dots vs 230k dots
Help
4x higher resolution screen
Wide angle Better wide angle 25 mm vs 28 mm
Help
More than 10% better wide angle
Aperture Wider aperture f/3.1 vs f/3.3
Help
At its widest zoom, the L120's lens captures marginally more light (0.2 f-stops)
Nikon Coolpix L120 Learn more about
the Nikon L120

Advantages of the Olympus SP-610 UZ

Report a correction
Size Slightly smaller 107x72x73 mm vs 110x77x78 mm
Help
More than 10% smaller
Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity 3,200 ISO vs 1,600 ISO
Help
The SP-610 UZ's maximum light sensitivity is 1 f-stop better
Thickness Slightly thinner 2.9" vs 3.1"
Help
Around 10% thinner
Lowest price Slightly cheaper $232.22 vs $256.95
Help
The best price we've seen is $25 cheaper (around 10% less)
Olympus SP-610 UZ Learn more about
the Olympus SP-610 UZ
vs

recommendations

Which camera do we recommend? Relative to the best recent super zooms, and ignoring price

Snapsort Recommends
Nikon Coolpix L120 Nikon Coolpix L120 55
Retailer
    Style
      Color
        You save

        vs

        51 Olympus SP-610 UZ Olympus SP-610 UZ
        Retailer
          Style
            Color
              You save

              similarities

              Compared to recent digicams

              Common Strengths Common Weaknesses
              Macro focus Good macro capabilities Help
              1 cm
              Viewfinder No viewfinders Help
              Can only preview photos on the screen
              Sensor type Lower-end sensor types Help
              CCD
              Thickness Quite thick Help
              L120:3.1"
              SP-610 UZ:2.9"
              Panorama Neither camera stitches together panoramas Help
              You could stitch photos in post
              Weight Heavy Help
              L120:406 g
              SP-610 UZ:405 g
              Supports RAW No RAW support Help
              Less editing fidelity
              HDR Neither has in-camera HDR Help
              You could do HDR manually
              Continuous shooting Slow continuous shooting Help
              L120:0.7 fps
              SP-610 UZ:1.1 fps
              Movie format HD (720p) video Help
              L120:720p
              SP-610 UZ:720p @ 30fps

              Compared to recent super zooms

              Common Strengths Common Weaknesses
              Size Fairly small Help
              L120:110x77x78 mm
              SP-610 UZ:107x72x73 mm
              Weight Light weight Help
              L120:406 g
              SP-610 UZ:405 g
              Thickness Thin Help
              L120:3.1"
              SP-610 UZ:2.9"
              External flash No external flash support Help
              Less expandable
              External mic jack Neither has an external mic jack Help
              Limited to the in-camera mic
              Screen flips out No flip-out screens Help
              Less flexible
              Image stabilization Poor image stabilization Help
              Sensor shift
              Zoom Poor zoom Help
              L120:21x
              SP-610 UZ:22x

              competitors

              Shared Competitors

              Advantages

              Disadvantages

              Nikon Coolpix L830

              Nikon Coolpix L830

              Super zoom

              $197

              Zoom Has slightly more zoom
              Movie format Records higher quality movies
              Thickness Is thicker
              Weight Is slightly heavier
              Fujifilm FinePix S2950

              Fujifilm FinePix S2950

              Super zoom

              $300

              Panorama Creates panoramas in-camera
              Viewfinder Has a viewfinder
              Wide angle Has a slightly narrower wide angle lens
              Nikon Coolpix L310

              Nikon Coolpix L310

              Super zoom

              Macro focus Much worse macro focusing
              Canon Rebel T3i

              Canon Rebel T3i

              Entry-level DSLR

              $499 body only

              $549 - $579 with 18-55mm lens

              Movie format Records higher quality movies
              True resolution Takes much higher resolution photos
              Lowest price Is significantly more expensive
              Weight Is slightly heavier

              Nikon Coolpix L120 Competitors

              Advantages

              Disadvantages

              Nikon Coolpix L810

              Nikon Coolpix L810

              Super zoom

              $149

              3D Takes 3D photos
              Panorama Can create panoramas in-camera
              Thickness Slightly thicker
              Weight Slightly heavier
              Nikon Coolpix L320

              Nikon Coolpix L320

              Super zoom

              $214

              Panorama Can create panoramas in-camera
              Wide angle Better wide angle
              Screen resolution Much lower resolution screen
              Size Slightly larger
              Canon PowerShot SX150 IS

              Canon PowerShot SX150 IS

              Travel zoom

              $139 - $250

              Size Smaller
              Image stabilization Better image stabilization
              Screen resolution Much lower resolution screen
              Wide angle Worse wide angle
              Nikon Coolpix L820

              Nikon Coolpix L820

              Super zoom

              $168

              3D Takes 3D photos
              Movie format Higher resolution movies
              Size Slightly larger
              Weight Heavier

              Olympus SP-610 UZ Competitors

              Advantages

              Disadvantages

              Canon PowerShot SX160 IS

              Canon PowerShot SX160 IS

              Travel zoom

              $140

              Image stabilization Better image stabilization
              Size Smaller
              Aperture Narrower aperture
              Zoom Slightly less zoom
              Canon PowerShot SX510 HS

              Canon PowerShot SX510 HS

              Super zoom

              $199

              Supports 24p Supports 24p
              Movie format Higher resolution movies
              Aperture Slightly narrower aperture
              Thickness Slightly thicker
              Canon PowerShot ELPH 140 IS

              Canon PowerShot ELPH 140 IS

              Travel zoom

              $114 - $162

              Size Smaller
              Image stabilization Better image stabilization
              Screen size Smaller screen
              Zoom Less zoom
              Olympus SP-620 UZ

              Olympus 620 UZ

              Travel zoom

              $159

              3D Takes 3D photos
              Panorama Can create panoramas in-camera
              Weight Slightly heavier
              Canon PowerShot ELPH 340 HS

              Canon PowerShot ELPH 340 HS

              Travel zoom

              $179 - $204

              Movie format Higher resolution movies
              Sensor type Has a CMOS-family sensor
              Aperture Narrower aperture
              Zoom Less zoom

              appearance

              Nikon Coolpix L120 Olympus SP-610 UZ
              Nikon Coolpix L120 Olympus SP-610 UZ
              Nikon Coolpix L120 Olympus SP-610 UZ

              discussion

              Nikon Coolpix L120
              Coolpix L120
              Nikon

              Report a correction
              Olympus SP-610 UZ
              SP-610 UZ
              Olympus

              Report a correction

              Showing 0 comments