Updated (April 2012): Compare the Nikon 1 J1 vs Sony NEX F3

Sony NEX F3 vs Nikon 1 J1

Winner
Sony NEX F3

66

Nikon 1 J1

44

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Sony NEX F3

Low noise at high ISO
Low light performance
1,114 ISO
Great image quality
Overall image quality
73.0
High resolution screen
Screen resolution
920k dots
Great color depth
Color depth
22.7 bits
 

Reasons to buy the Nikon 1 J1

High-speed framerate
High speed movies
1,200 fps
Continuous shooting
Rapid fire
60 fps
Startup delay
Almost no delay when powering up
1400 ms startup delay
Shutter lag
Barely any delay taking photos
94 ms shutter lag

galleries

Explore our gallery of 46 sample photos taken by the Nikon 1 J1.

competitors

Sony NEX F3 Competitors

Sony Alpha NEX-3N

Sony Alpha NEX-3N

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$376 body only

Shutter lag Less shutter lag
Overall image quality Slightly better image quality
Screen resolution Much lower resolution screen
Sony NEX-5N

Sony NEX 5N

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$354 body only

$887 with 16-50mm lens

Touch screen Has a touch screen
Color depth Better color depth
Startup delay More startup delay
Sony Alpha NEX-5

Sony Alpha NEX-5

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$390 body only

$481 with 16-50mm lens

Startup delay Significantly less startup delay
Continuous shooting Shoots faster
Low light performance More noise at high ISO

Nikon 1 J1 Competitors

Nikon 1 J5

Nikon 1 J5

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$480 - $497 with 10-30mm lens

Screen resolution Much higher resolution screen
Color depth Better color depth
High-speed framerate Lower speed movies
Nikon 1 V1

Nikon 1 V1

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$774 with 10-30mm lens

Screen resolution Much higher resolution screen
Viewfinder Has a viewfinder
Autofocus Slower autofocus
Nikon 1 S1

Nikon 1 S1

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$459 with 11-2mm lens

Dynamic range More dynamic range
Weight Slightly lighter
Color depth Worse color depth

discussion

Sony NEX F3
NEX F3
Sony

Report a correction
Nikon 1 J1
1 J1
Nikon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments