Updated (September 2011): Compare the Nikon 1 J1 vs Nikon Coolpix P7000

Nikon Coolpix P7000 vs Nikon 1 J1

Winner
Nikon Coolpix P7000

79

Nikon 1 J1

45

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Nikon Coolpix P7000

High resolution screen
Screen resolution
921k dots
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Lens
  2. Sensor shift
24p movies
Supports 24p
For that film look
External mic jack
External mic jack
Record higher quality audio with a microphone
 

Reasons to buy the Nikon 1 J1

High-speed framerate
High speed movies
1,200 fps
Continuous shooting
Rapid fire
60 fps
Startup delay
Almost no delay when powering up
1400 ms startup delay
Movie continuous focus
Movie continuous focus
Makes it easy to get in-focus movies

galleries

Explore our gallery of 46 sample photos taken by the Nikon 1 J1.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Nikon Coolpix P7000.

competitors

Nikon Coolpix P7000 Competitors

Nikon Coolpix A900

Nikon Coolpix A900

Travel zoom

$219 - $397

Movie format Higher resolution movies
Zoom More zoom
Aperture Narrower aperture
Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX7

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX7

Pro digicam

$521

High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies
Aperture Significantly wider aperture
Supports 24p No 24p support
Canon PowerShot G12

Canon PowerShot G12

Pro digicam

$450

Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
Startup delay Slightly less startup delay
Screen resolution Significantly lower resolution screen

Nikon 1 J1 Competitors

Nikon 1 V1

Nikon 1 V1

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$495 body only

Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
External mic jack Has an external mic jack
Autofocus Slower autofocus
Nikon 1 S1

Nikon 1 S1

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$299 with 11-2mm lens

Weight Slightly lighter
Nikon 1 J5

Nikon 1 J5

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$333 - $497 with 10-30mm lens

Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Touch screen Has a touch screen

discussion

Nikon Coolpix P7000
Coolpix P7000
Nikon

Report a correction
Nikon 1 J1
1 J1
Nikon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments