Nikon D750 vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 (Lumix DMC-FZ2000)

Winner
Nikon D750

100

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 (Lumix DMC-FZ2000)

53

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Nikon D750

Great viewfinder coverage
Viewfinder coverage
100%
Movie continuous focus
Movie continuous focus
Makes it easy to get in-focus movies
Built-in focus motor
Badge
Autofocuses with more lenses
Great battery life
Battery life
1230 shots
 

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 (Lumix DMC-FZ2000)

Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Lens
Touch screen
Touch screen
Fewer buttons
Continuous shooting
Rapid fire
12 fps
Screen flips out
Flip-out screen
Great for movies

galleries

Explore our gallery of 48 sample photos taken by the Nikon D750.

competitors

Nikon D750 Competitors

Nikon D500

Nikon D500

Pro DSLR

$1,399 - $1,797 body only

$2,114 - $2,397 with 16-80mm lens

Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
Screen resolution Much higher resolution screen
Storage slots Has fewer storage slots
Nikon D610

Nikon D610

Pro DSLR

$790 - $1,497 body only

$1,774 - $2,447 with 28-300mm lens

Lowest price Slightly cheaper
Battery life Much shorter battery life
Nikon D810

Nikon D810

Pro DSLR

$1,999 - $2,797 body only

$2,583 - $3,297 with 24-120mm lens

True resolution Higher true resolution
Fastest shutter speed Faster max shutter speed
Screen flips out Screen does not flip out

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 (Lumix DMC-FZ2000) Competitors

Placeholder

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX99

Travel zoom

$448

Size Much smaller
Thickness Much thinner
Aperture Narrower aperture
Placeholder

Canon PowerShot SX740 HS

Travel zoom

$338 - $399

Size Much smaller
Thickness Much thinner
Touch screen No touch screen
Placeholder

Panasonic Lumix DC-FZ1000 II

Super zoom

$898

Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
Size Slightly smaller
External mic jack Lacks an external mic jack

discussion

Nikon D750
D750
Nikon

Report a correction
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 (Lumix DMC-FZ2000)
Lumix DMC-FZ2500 (Lumix DMC-FZ2000)
Panasonic

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments