Nikon D750 vs Nikon D3

Winner
Nikon D750

100

Nikon D3

82

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Nikon D750

Low noise at high ISO
Low light performance
2,956 ISO
Flip-out screen
Screen flips out
Great for movies
In-camera HDR
HDR
Combines multiple exposures
Movie continuous focus
Movie continuous focus
Makes it easy to get in-focus movies
 

Reasons to buy the Nikon D3

Continuous shooting
Rapid fire
9 fps
Startup delay
Almost no delay when powering up
300 ms startup delay
Shutter lag
Barely any delay taking photos
88 ms shutter lag
Battery life
Great battery life
4300 shots

galleries

Explore our gallery of 48 sample photos taken by the Nikon D750.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Nikon D3.

competitors

Nikon D750 Competitors

Nikon D500

Nikon D500

Pro DSLR

$1,649 - $1,897 body only

$2,397 - $2,497 with 16-80mm lens

Screen resolution Much higher resolution screen
Touch screen Has a touch screen
Viewfinder size Smaller viewfinder
Nikon D810

Nikon D810

Pro DSLR

$2,199 - $2,797 body only

$2,900 - $3,297 with 24-120mm lens

True resolution Much higher true resolution
Low light performance Slightly lower noise at high ISO
Screen flips out Screen does not flip out
Nikon D610

Nikon D610

Pro DSLR

$1,397 - $1,497 body only

$1,725 - $2,447 with 28-300mm lens

Color depth Better color depth
Overall image quality Slightly better image quality
Screen flips out Screen does not flip out

Nikon D3 Competitors

Nikon D700

Nikon D700

Pro DSLR

$106 body only

Size Significantly smaller
Low light performance Slightly lower noise at high ISO
Battery life Much shorter battery life
Nikon D3S

Nikon D3S

Pro DSLR

$777 body only

Low light performance Much lower noise at high ISO
Movie format Shoots movies
Battery life Slightly shorter battery life
Nikon D800

Nikon D800

Pro DSLR

$2,899 body only

Low light performance Much lower noise at high ISO
True resolution Much higher true resolution
Battery life Much shorter battery life

discussion

Nikon D750
D750
Nikon

Report a correction
Nikon D3
D3
Nikon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments