Nikon D750 vs Nikon D3

Winner
Nikon D750

100

Nikon D3

79

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Nikon D750

Low noise at high ISO
Low light performance
2,956 ISO
Great image quality
Overall image quality
93.0
Flip-out screen
Screen flips out
Great for movies
In-camera HDR
HDR
Combines multiple exposures
 

Reasons to buy the Nikon D3

Continuous shooting
Rapid fire
9 fps
Shutter lag
Barely any delay taking photos
88 ms shutter lag
Battery life
Great battery life
4300 shots
Fastest shutter speed
Fast shutter speed
1/8000 of a second

galleries

Explore our gallery of 48 sample photos taken by the Nikon D750.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Nikon D3.

competitors

Nikon D750 Competitors

Nikon D810

Nikon D810

Pro DSLR

$2,261 - $2,797 body only

$2,900 - $3,297 with 24-120mm lens

True resolution Significantly higher true resolution
Color depth Better color depth
Screen flips out Screen does not flip out
Nikon D610

Nikon D610

Pro DSLR

$1,480 - $1,497 body only

$1,658 - $1,997 with 24-85mm lens

Color depth Better color depth
Overall image quality Slightly better image quality
Screen flips out Screen does not flip out
Nikon D500

Nikon D500

Pro DSLR

$1,599 - $1,897 body only

$2,456 - $2,497 with 16-80mm lens

Screen resolution Much higher resolution screen
Focus points Many more focus points
Viewfinder size Smaller viewfinder

Nikon D3 Competitors

Nikon D700

Nikon D700

Pro DSLR

$999 body only

Size Significantly smaller
Thickness Much thinner
Battery life Much shorter battery life
Nikon D610

Nikon D610

Pro DSLR

$1,480 - $1,497 body only

$1,658 - $1,997 with 24-85mm lens

Overall image quality Significantly better image quality
Low light performance Lower noise at high ISO
Battery life Much shorter battery life
Nikon D800

Nikon D800

Pro DSLR

$2,495 body only

Overall image quality Significantly better image quality
Low light performance Lower noise at high ISO
Battery life Much shorter battery life

discussion

Nikon D750
D750
Nikon

Report a correction
Nikon D3
D3
Nikon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments