Nikon D750 vs Nikon DF

Winner
Nikon D750

100

Nikon DF

87

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Nikon D750

Flip-out screen
Screen flips out
Great for movies
Movie continuous focus
Movie continuous focus
Makes it easy to get in-focus movies
More storage slots
Storage slots
2
Built-in flash
Built-in flash
External flash not needed
 

Reasons to buy the Nikon DF

Battery life
Great battery life
1400 shots
Size
Really small
Professional size (144×110×67 mm)
Thickness
Thin
2.6"
Viewfinder
Great viewfinder
Pentaprism

galleries

Explore our gallery of 48 sample photos taken by the Nikon D750.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Nikon DF.

competitors

Nikon D750 Competitors

Nikon D500

Nikon D500

Pro DSLR

$1,399 - $1,797 body only

$2,114 - $2,397 with 16-80mm lens

Screen resolution Much higher resolution screen
Focus points Many more focus points
True resolution Significantly lower true resolution
Nikon D610

Nikon D610

Pro DSLR

$790 - $1,497 body only

$1,774 - $2,447 with 28-300mm lens

Lowest price Cheaper
Screen resolution Lower resolution screen
Nikon D810

Nikon D810

Pro DSLR

$1,999 - $2,797 body only

$2,583 - $3,297 with 24-120mm lens

True resolution Much higher true resolution
Fastest shutter speed Much faster max shutter speed
Screen flips out Screen does not flip out

Nikon DF Competitors

Nikon D810

Nikon D810

Pro DSLR

$1,999 - $2,797 body only

$2,583 - $3,297 with 24-120mm lens

True resolution Much higher true resolution
Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
Thickness Much thicker
Nikon D5300

Nikon D5300

Entry-level DSLR

$474 body only

$459 with 18-55mm lens

True resolution Much higher true resolution
Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
Viewfinder size Much smaller viewfinder
Nikon D7200

Nikon D7200

Entry-level DSLR

$629 - $697 body only

$997 - $1,150 with 18-140mm lens

True resolution Much higher true resolution
Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
Viewfinder size Smaller viewfinder

discussion

Nikon D750
D750
Nikon

Report a correction
Nikon DF
DF
Nikon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments