Updated (February 2013): Compare the Nikon D7100 vs Sony SLT-A77

Sony SLT A77 vs Nikon D7100

Sony SLT-A77


Nikon D7100



Reasons to buy the Sony SLT A77

Large viewfinder
Viewfinder size
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Sensor shift
Rapid fire
Continuous shooting
12 fps
Flip-out screen
Screen flips out
Great for movies

Reasons to buy the Nikon D7100

Color depth
Great color depth
24.2 bits
Dynamic range
Wide dynamic range
13.7 EV
Screen size
Large screen
Startup delay
Almost no delay when powering up
300 ms startup delay


Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Nikon D7100.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Sony SLT-A77.


Sony SLT-A77 Competitors

Sony SLT A77 II

Sony SLT A77 II


$1,198 body only

$1,798 with 16-50mm lens

Low light performance Much lower noise at high ISO
Focus points More focus points
GPS No built-in GPS
Sony Alpha A6000

Sony Alpha A6000

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$444 - $448 body only

$525 - $548 with 16-50mm lens

Low light performance Much lower noise at high ISO
Image stabilization Better image stabilization
Autofocus Slower autofocus
Sony SLT A58

Sony SLT A58

Entry-level DSLR

$632 with 18-55mm lens

Size Smaller
Battery life Slightly longer battery life
Screen size Much smaller screen

Nikon D7100 Competitors

Nikon D7200

Nikon D7200

Entry-level DSLR

$749 - $797 body only

$1,097 with 18-140mm lens

Battery life Slightly longer battery life
Movie continuous focus Doesn't focus continuously recording movies
Nikon D5300

Nikon D5300

Entry-level DSLR

$445 body only

$500 - $549 with 18-55mm lens

Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
Weather sealed No weather sealing
Nikon D7000

Nikon D7000

Entry-level DSLR

$1,275 with 18-200mm lens

Battery life Slightly longer battery life
Screen size Significantly smaller screen


Sony SLT-A77

Report a correction
Nikon D7100

Report a correction

Showing 5 comments

David (1:53 PM, March 22, 2014)
This website seems really ANTI SONY, As many other sites where Nikon and Canon are always given extra points just for the brand or the lots of people giving bad reviews to Sony cameras, Sony has always been more innovative in other fields and end up being the best, they are catching up now with cameras. I bought a Nikon 7100 against Sony A77, based on the review here and some other guys in youtube who really seemed to love Nikon, then after a week turned Nikon back and got the Sony, best decision ever. It is true that Nikon 7100 takes better quality pictures ( visible at 100% size and JPEG only ) and that Sony is a noisy camera even at low ISO, But if you shoot in RAW you will get very similar results with both of them. Also the battery of the Sony is an issue. So as a traditional camera and for pure photography maybe Nikon 7100 is better. Now 12fps of the Sony is just awesome, the AF is super fast and in continuous with the face detection very very accurate, then the Electronic View Finder (EVF) is the best, you try it you never want an OVF, you can see EVERYTHING before you shoot, a lot of info, the changes you are making...so OVF should not be an adventage anymore, sorry. And I hope all cameras get an EVF from now on. The focus peeking feature is amazing, allows you to manual focus super fast and accurately, and the kit lens 16-50mm 2.8....Best Kit lens you can get with a body and weather sealed. The LCD of the Sony can rotate and move to many positions which for video and composition is great, Nikon nothing. And the thing that I love the most, Sony video is really good, with the fast autofocus, Nikon video just sucks, sorry. So the PROs of the Sony A77 are many more than CONS campared to the NIkon. So unless you are going to shoot only JPEG in low light conditions that you need a high ISO and you don't want to edit your pictures later, or you already own some Nikon lenses...Sony is better.
Avatar for Mayank Sahu Mayank Sahu (10:29 AM, September 16, 2013)
just that it is larger, brighter, ability to review Photos directly in viewfinder, detailed info display inside EVF.. and yeah they can work in dark. you don't have a reason to hate EVF. It's very clear that you have either used EVF in a low end camera or have never used EVF at all. Just use a High res OLED EVF for sometime and I bet you can't go back to conventional OVF.
Jdoakey (11:17 PM, September 05, 2013)
No, it doesn't "suck", as you so eloquently put it. Quite simply, if you haven't used a Sony EVF for an extended period, then you cannot judge. I have, and it's brilliant. Overall, the Sony A77 is a fabulous camera.
asdf (11:34 PM, September 03, 2013)
> in the D7000 review you rated OVF as a plus
yes, evf sucks
Avatar for Gil Santavenere Gil Santavenere (1:47 AM, August 17, 2013)
Snapshot previously rated the Nikon D7000 @ 69 vs Sony A77 @ 66. Sony made the D7000 sensor. The D7000 was 16mp vs A77 24mp. Not sure how you rated the D7000 over the A77.

I sold my Nikon D7000 equipment and switched to Sony A77 with Sony and Zeiss lenses. Nikon makes very good lenses and traditional camera bodies. Sony EVF and SLT technology surpasses the traditional OVF and SLR technology, but in the D7000 review you rated OVF as a plus.

For the D7100 you give a plus for in-camera HDR, which Sony has always had in A77. Sony made a great decision to have SteadyShot option to adjust for "camera shake" in the camera body. I believe the reason Nikon decided to put their "Vibration Reduction" into lenses years ago was a marketing decision.

Nikon appeared to recognize their technology weaknesses when they chose Sony to build sensors for the D800 and D7000.

Your review would lead many buyers to simply buy the Nikon D7100.