Nikon D3X vs Nikon D7100

Winner
Nikon D3X

100

Nikon D7100

90

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Nikon D3X

Low noise at high ISO
Low light performance
1,992 ISO
Large viewfinder
Viewfinder size
0.70x
Barely any delay taking photos
Shutter lag
161 ms shutter lag
Great battery life
Battery life
4400 shots
 

Reasons to buy the Nikon D7100

Screen size
Large screen
3.2"
HDR
In-camera HDR
Combines multiple exposures
Movie continuous focus
Movie continuous focus
Makes it easy to get in-focus movies
Lens availability
Slightly more lenses available
230 lenses

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Nikon D7100.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Nikon D3X.

competitors

Nikon D3X Competitors

Nikon D3S

Nikon D3S

Pro DSLR

Low light performance Much lower noise at high ISO
Startup delay Much less startup delay
True resolution Much lower true resolution
Nikon D800

Nikon D800

Pro DSLR

$2,899 body only

Low light performance Much lower noise at high ISO
Startup delay Much less startup delay
Battery life Much shorter battery life
Nikon D3

Nikon D3

Pro DSLR

Low light performance Much lower noise at high ISO
Shutter lag Much less shutter lag
True resolution Much lower true resolution

Nikon D7100 Competitors

Nikon D7200

Nikon D7200

Entry-level DSLR

$799 - $997 body only

$1,048 - $1,297 with 18-140mm lens

Low light performance Lower noise at high ISO
Overall image quality Better image quality
Movie continuous focus Doesn't focus continuously recording movies
Nikon D5600

Nikon D5600

Entry-level DSLR

$620 - $647 body only

$619 - $747 with 18-55mm lens

Startup delay Much less startup delay
Shutter lag Much less shutter lag
Weather sealed No weather sealing
Nikon D750

Nikon D750

Pro DSLR

$1,399 - $1,797 body only

$1,965 - $2,297 with 24-120mm lens

Low light performance Much lower noise at high ISO
Overall image quality Better image quality
Lens availability Fewer lenses available

discussion

Nikon D3X
D3X
Nikon

Report a correction
Nikon D7100
D7100
Nikon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments