Nikon D750 vs Nikon D600

Winner
Nikon D750

100

Nikon D600

88

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Nikon D750

Flip-out screen
Screen flips out
Great for movies
Great battery life
Battery life
1230 shots
Great viewfinder
Viewfinder
Pentaprism
Movie continuous focus
Movie continuous focus
Makes it easy to get in-focus movies
 

Reasons to buy the Nikon D600

Startup delay
Almost no delay when powering up
300 ms startup delay
Viewfinder
Great viewfinder
Pentaprism
Movie continuous focus
Movie continuous focus
Makes it easy to get in-focus movies
Interchangeable lenses
Interchangeable lenses
Many lenses to choose from

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Nikon D600.
Explore our gallery of 48 sample photos taken by the Nikon D750.

competitors

Nikon D750 Competitors

Placeholder

Nikon Z6

Boutique

$1,997 - $2,147

Focus points Many more focus points
Continuous shooting Shoots much faster
Viewfinder Has a digital viewfinder
Nikon D610

Nikon D610

Pro DSLR

$944 - $1,497 body only

$1,890 - $2,447 with 28-300mm lens

Lowest price Cheaper
Screen resolution Lower resolution screen
Nikon D810

Nikon D810

Pro DSLR

$1,763 - $2,797 body only

$2,301 - $3,297 with 24-120mm lens

True resolution Much higher true resolution
Fastest shutter speed Much faster max shutter speed
Screen flips out Screen does not flip out

Nikon D600 Competitors

Nikon D610

Nikon D610

Pro DSLR

$944 - $1,497 body only

$1,890 - $2,447 with 28-300mm lens

Continuous shooting Shoots faster
Lowest price Much cheaper
Nikon D7200

Nikon D7200

Entry-level DSLR

$629 - $1,184 body only

$997 - $1,349 with 18-140mm lens

Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
Lens availability More lenses available
Movie continuous focus Doesn't focus continuously recording movies
Sony A7

Sony A7

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$798 body only

$998 with 28-70mm lens

Focus points Many more focus points
Thickness Much thinner
Viewfinder Has a digital viewfinder

discussion

Nikon D750
D750
Nikon

Report a correction
Nikon D600
D600
Nikon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments