Nikon D5100 vs Samsung NX11

Winner
Nikon D5100

57

Samsung NX11

36

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Nikon D5100

Wide dynamic range
Dynamic range
13.6 EV
Flip-out screen
Screen flips out
Great for movies
Movie continuous focus
Movie continuous focus
Makes it easy to get in-focus movies
External mic jack
External mic jack
Record higher quality audio with a microphone
 

Reasons to buy the Samsung NX11

Size
Really small
Mid size (123×87×40 mm)
Screen type
OLED Screen
Bright and vivid
Thickness
Thin
1.6"

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Nikon D5100.
Explore our gallery of 15 sample photos taken by the Samsung NX11.

competitors

Nikon D5100 Competitors

Nikon D3300

Nikon D3300

Entry-level DSLR

$465 body only

$419 - $447 with 18-55mm lens

True resolution Higher true resolution
Overall image quality Slightly better image quality
Screen flips out Screen does not flip out
Nikon D5300

Nikon D5300

Entry-level DSLR

$413 body only

$450 - $697 with 18-55mm lens

Screen size Significantly larger screen
GPS Has a GPS
Battery life Slightly shorter battery life
Nikon D3200

Nikon D3200

Entry-level DSLR

$300 body only

$397 with 18-55mm lens

True resolution Higher true resolution
Color depth Better color depth
Screen flips out Screen does not flip out

Samsung NX11 Competitors

Samsung NX300

Samsung NX300

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$554 body only

$730 with 20-50mm lens

Screen size Much larger screen
Overall image quality Better image quality
Built-in flash No built-in flash
Sony NEX-5N

Sony NEX 5N

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$691 body only

$853 with 16-50mm lens

Overall image quality Better image quality
Dynamic range More dynamic range
Screen type Doesn't have an OLED screen
Sony NEX F3

Sony NEX F3

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$250 body only

$520 with 18-55mm lens

Dynamic range More dynamic range
Overall image quality Better image quality
Screen type Doesn't have an OLED screen

discussion

Nikon D5100
D5100
Nikon

Report a correction
Samsung NX11
NX11
Samsung

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments