| Nikon D5100 |
|
Pentax K-5 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Nikon D5100 |
|
Pentax K-5 | ||||||||
| Snapsort recommends the Pentax K-5. |
| Common Strengths | Common Weaknesses | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
Shared Competitors |
Advantages |
Disadvantages |
||||||||||||
Nikon D3200Entry-level DSLR $547 with 18-55mm lens |
|
|
||||||||||||
Canon Rebel T3iEntry-level DSLR $549 body only $599 - $649 with 18-55mm lens |
|
|
||||||||||||
Nikon D5200Entry-level DSLR $697 body only $797 with 18-55mm lens |
|
|
||||||||||||
Nikon D90Entry-level DSLR $675 - $899 body only $799 - $1,099 with 18-105mm lens |
|
|
||||||||||||
Canon Rebel T4iEntry-level DSLR $672 - $800 body only $719 - $749 with 18-55mm lens |
|
|
||||||||||||
Nikon D7000Entry-level DSLR $897 body only $997 with 18-105mm lens |
|
|
||||||||||||
Canon EOS 60DPro DSLR $699 - $899 body only $999 - $1,279 with 18-135mm lens |
|
|
||||||||||||
Nikon D5100 Competitors |
Advantages |
Disadvantages |
||||||||||||
Nikon D3100Entry-level DSLR $447 - $740 with 18-55mm lens |
|
|
||||||||||||
Pentax K-5 Competitors |
Advantages |
Disadvantages |
||||||||||||
Pentax K-5 IIEntry-level DSLR $768 - $997 body only $1,115 - $1,547 with 18-135mm lens |
|
|
||||||||||||
Showing 6 comments
I agree with Sdick. If you spend 700 for body you won't spend 30 000 for all available lenses.
I also find the bias and skew of this site to be kind of cheap. Brand "X" might have 50 gazillion lenses, and "Y" has only 30. I only need/want 3, so am I really disadvantaged to choose those three lenses from 30? "X" is more popular--save it for the MA pageant. I think both these cams are great pieces of engineering and very capable for producing excellent photos. The K-5 wins hands-down for durability, backwards compatibility of lenses, and slightly less-hands-down on some of the issues that will affect image quality. It admittedly does lose out as a pinch-hitter of a video camera--though both of these are pinch-hitters in this category in my opinion. And the K-5 price is a bit higher--that generally doesn't stop the serious photog who makes a living. I just wish Pentax would have left off some of the bells-n-whistles they stuck into this one. Shame on ALL the brands for some of the bandwagons they jump on. Toy camera? Miniature effect? How serious do you take yourselves? And why do you look for/want/need some of these worthless gadgets on a serious machine? Buy the toy camera for $6 on e-bay and get the "real" effect. Give me a great lens or two, durability, good metering, PASM and excellent picture quality. Affordability would also be nice. I don't need much else. The Sigma SD-1 just about knocked it out of the park in my books--until I saw the price.