| Nikon D5100 |
|
Nikon D3100 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Nikon D5100 |
|
Nikon D3100 | ||||||||
| Snapsort recommends the Nikon D5100. |
|
NikonD5100
|
vs |
NikonD3100
|
|||||
| Uses |
Travel
On holiday or vacation
|
402
|
331
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vote | Vote | ||||||
|
Sports
Fast action, sometimes indoors
|
412
|
243
|
|||||
| Vote | Vote | ||||||
| Features |
Color accuracy
White balance in varied lighting
|
403
|
251
|
||||
| Vote | Vote | ||||||
|
Still image focusing
Speed and accuracy
|
374
|
249
|
|||||
| Vote | Vote | ||||||
|
Video focusing
Speed and accuracy
|
377
|
250
|
|||||
| Vote | Vote | ||||||
|
Manual settings
How quickly and easily you can change settings
|
371
|
261
|
|||||
| Vote | Vote | ||||||
|
Build quality
Is it sturdy, well made, plastic or metal
|
379
|
257
|
|||||
| Vote | Vote | ||||||
| Join in the discussion below! |
| Common Strengths | Common Weaknesses | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
Shared Competitors |
Advantages |
Disadvantages |
||||||||||||
Canon Rebel T3iEntry-level DSLR $609 - $800 body only $709 - $850 with 18-55mm lens |
|
|
||||||||||||
Canon Rebel T2iEntry-level DSLR $499 - $949 body only $579 - $867 with 18-55mm lens |
|
|
||||||||||||
Nikon D90Entry-level DSLR $869 - $897 body only $1,099 - $1,200 with 18-105mm lens |
|
|
||||||||||||
Nikon D7000Entry-level DSLR $1,097 - $1,199 body only $1,227 with 55-200mm lens |
|
|
||||||||||||
Canon Rebel T3Entry-level DSLR $379 body only $479 - $554 with 18-55mm lens |
|
|
||||||||||||
Canon EOS 60DPro DSLR $897 - $1,304 body only $1,130 - $1,342 with 18-135mm lens |
|
|
||||||||||||
Nikon D5000Entry-level DSLR $997 with 18-55mm lens |
|
|||||||||||||
Nikon D5100 Competitors |
Advantages |
Disadvantages |
||||||||||||
No significant competitors found that are specific to the Nikon D5100. |
||||||||||||||
Nikon D3100 Competitors |
Advantages |
Disadvantages |
||||||||||||
No significant competitors found that are specific to the Nikon D3100. |
||||||||||||||
Here are some links to help you find other cameras with similar features to both of these:
Speech is free, but discussion at Snapsort is moderated! Please discuss your opinion of these cameras here, and discuss feedback for Snapsort at our support community.
Showing 25 comments
Please can u put some more light on the issue as I am bit confused in buying 3100 and put the xtra bucks on glass.
Good point! Initally I had my heart on the D3100 but did more research on the D5100 and confused myself (so to speak). So my question is, if money wasn't a factor which camera should one purchase?
I ask that because I found that Costco has the D3100 with 18-55mm VR Lens + 55-200mm VR Lens, Training Pack Bundle, Two Training DVDs, Case and 4GB SD Card for $699. Like I said, I was set on that until I researched the D5100 and found out that Costco also has for the D5100 with 18-55mm and 55-300mm VR lenses, case, 4G 30MB SD card, dvd and guide for $950 which seems to be a GREAT deal given that 300mm is almost $400 by itself.
So for the $250 extra is it no question that I should get the D5100 package as described above?
Do any cameras come close to the D5100? I saw the D7000 but that is out of my price range right now. Hell the D5100 is pushing it but seems worth it from a value perspective.
Hopefully with classes, perfect practice and skill, the camera will pay for itself down the line regardless of which I get.
Thank so much to all that reply.
PS. Sweet pic!
unless you are comparing between entry and pro then (well you would not be here looking for info).
Conclusion: Today's entry level Nikon's are way better than 3 year old (or even less) pro level body's. So if you buy the best (expensive) today how long will it be that you see a new entry level at half the price that out performs yours!!
Buy entry level and IF (and when) you become a better photographer then what your camera can offer...(by better I mean you are very comfortable to shoot your DSLR in manual and know what to expect)
This was shot with a D3100 and the kit lens 18-55mm (5 pics stitched)
d3100 - i like the price and sample photos tried it at the shop and feel happy with it.
d5100- at the middle, not entry level and said to have room for upgrades. i am doubtful about image quality, is it far better than d3100??
d90- so costly but will then have more flexibility when i want to upgrade lens.
help me! i just really want to take photos for product shots such as bags, shoes and clothes in white bg and probably with a model or two. i do not plan to upgrade someday i just need decent pix clear enough to sell my items and also be good enough for our tarpaulin advertisement printing.
I noticed you mentioned you had both a D3100 and a D5100! I am new to digital SLR photography and decided to buy my
very first camera.
I’m aware of the differences between the D3100 and the
D5100 that sites and reviews are listing, but actually I’m a little confused which one I should start with! And since
you have both, I believe you’ll know better what obvious differences are really there, and maybe you're the best to advise me! I also thougt about the D90 and got myself even more confused!!!
I had an idea that maybe I can go with the
D3100 if there are no REAL differences, and invest more in lenses? What do you
think?
I use the Nikon Nikkor AF-S 55-300mm f/4.5-5.6G ED VR on both my nikon d3100 and d5100 and use mainly for action shots of aircraft and find it very good and very stable even at 300
cheers Franz (Australia)
Since then I have done a lot of reading about DSLR cameras, specifically regarding sensors. I was looking to upgrade from the D3100 to a D5100, but I now find a flaw regarding one critical issue. Specifically regarding the D5100 vs D3100 comparison, I no longer believe SNAPSHOT's better image quality information. Why? Well, its simple. The pixel size of the D5100 sensor is notably smaller than the pixel size of the D3100, and since sensor performance includes the ability to absorb colors in the light spectrum, a smaller pixel cannot possibly out-perform a larger one. You only need to compare the sensors of FX versus DX cameras to begin to understand this fact. As a result, with due respect to SNAPSHOT, I find the metrics from DXOMark to be seriously flawed since the D3100 and D5100 use the same lenses. In short, there is simply no way the D5100 could rate an 80 (with its smaller pixel size and area) while the D3100 rates only a 67 with its larger pixel size and area. Hell, if smaller pixel size were advantageous the price of point-and-shoot cameras would be 10X what they are today, and FX cameras would cost less than DX cameras.
While several other quantifiable D5100 features make it extremely attractive, compared to the D3100, since we're taking photos and movies, it seems only reasonable to apply significant weight to the metrics from DXOMark and therefore I strongly believe the D3100 out-performs the D5100 per photo with its larger, spectrum capturing, pixels and sensor.
Of course, I am open to debate on this issue and I am prepared to share what several other manufacturers, including but not limited to Canon and Fuji had to say about the same "pixel-size" issue as it pertains to their cameras abilities to capture the highest quality images.
Thx guys.
And the D90 got an autofocus motor, does this make its AF faster?
I don't think the video mode is that important form me. It's the image quality and the controls that matters to me. Is the sensor in the D5100 much better than the D90's?
Isn't the D90 a better deal if I want to get into photography?
(I'm sorry for al those questions, but I really can't choose. I'm not even sure I will be allowed to buy one)
Probably I will first buy a telelens and use it with my father's D50 until I got my own DSLR (maybe next year because my parents don't allow me to buy one now, I bought a P100 6 months ago, but I regret I didn't buy a DSLR)
The Nikon Nikkor AF-S 55-300mm f/4.5-5.6G ED VR seems to be a good lens for not to much money.
Can anybody confirm that? Is it good or not?
I didn't find any other ...-300mm (or more) lenses with image stabilisation for less than €300.