Nikon D610 vs Nikon D500

Nikon D610
Nikon D500

Reasons to buy the Nikon D610

Almost no delay when powering up
Startup delay
300 ms startup delay
Movie continuous focus
Movie continuous focus
Makes it easy to get in-focus movies
More storage slots
Storage slots
2
Built-in flash
Built-in flash
External flash not needed
 

Reasons to buy the Nikon D500

Screen resolution
High resolution screen
2,359k dots
Light sensitivity
High ISO
1,640,000 ISO
Touch screen
Touch screen
Fewer buttons
Continuous shooting
Rapid fire
10 fps

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Nikon D610.

competitors

Nikon D610 Competitors

Nikon D750

Nikon D750

Pro DSLR

$1,265 - $1,697 body only

$1,825 - $2,197 with 24-120mm lens

Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
Lowest price More expensive
Nikon D7200

Nikon D7200

Entry-level DSLR

$729 - $1,181 body only

$1,021 - $1,297 with 18-140mm lens

Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
Lens availability More lenses available
Movie continuous focus Doesn't focus continuously recording movies
Placeholder

Nikon Z 6

Boutique

$1,997 - $2,594

Focus points Many more focus points
Screen resolution Much higher resolution screen
Viewfinder Has a digital viewfinder

Nikon D500 Competitors

Nikon D750

Nikon D750

Pro DSLR

$1,265 - $1,697 body only

$1,825 - $2,197 with 24-120mm lens

Storage slots Has more storage slots
True resolution Higher true resolution
Screen resolution Much lower resolution screen
Nikon D7200

Nikon D7200

Entry-level DSLR

$729 - $1,181 body only

$1,021 - $1,297 with 18-140mm lens

Storage slots Has more storage slots
True resolution Higher true resolution
Screen resolution Much lower resolution screen
Nikon D810

Nikon D810

Pro DSLR

$1,956 - $2,797 body only

$2,480 - $3,297 with 24-120mm lens

True resolution Much higher true resolution
Storage slots Has more storage slots
Screen resolution Much lower resolution screen

discussion

Nikon D610
D610
Nikon

Report a correction
Nikon D500
D500
Nikon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments