Nikon D7100 vs Nikon D400

Nikon D7100
Nikon D400

Reasons to buy the Nikon D7100

Movie continuous focus
Movie continuous focus
Makes it easy to get in-focus movies
Weather sealed
Weather sealed
Shoot in extreme weather
Great viewfinder
Viewfinder
Pentaprism
In-camera HDR
HDR
Combines multiple exposures
 

Reasons to buy the Nikon D400

Weather sealed
Weather sealed
Shoot in extreme weather
Viewfinder
Great viewfinder
Pentaprism
HDR
In-camera HDR
Combines multiple exposures
Viewfinder coverage
Great viewfinder coverage
100%

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Nikon D7100.

competitors

Nikon D7100 Competitors

Nikon D7200

Nikon D7200

Entry-level DSLR

$779 - $997 body only

$1,109 - $1,297 with 18-140mm lens

Shutter lag Much less shutter lag
Overall image quality Better image quality
Movie continuous focus Doesn't focus continuously recording movies
Nikon D5600

Nikon D5600

Entry-level DSLR

$697 body only

$797 with 18-55mm lens

Touch screen Has a touch screen
Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
Weather sealed No weather sealing
Nikon D5500

Nikon D5500

Entry-level DSLR

$506 - $597 body only

$549 - $697 with 18-55mm lens

Touch screen Has a touch screen
Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
Weather sealed No weather sealing

Nikon D400 Competitors

Nikon D7200

Nikon D7200

Entry-level DSLR

$779 - $997 body only

$1,109 - $1,297 with 18-140mm lens

Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
Light sensitivity (boost) Better boost ISO
Continuous shooting Shoots slower
Nikon D7000

Nikon D7000

Entry-level DSLR

$899 body only

$670 with 18-55mm lens

Battery life Slightly longer battery life
Viewfinder size Slightly larger viewfinder
HDR Lacks in-camera HDR
Canon EOS 7D Mark II

Canon EOS 7D Mark II

Pro DSLR

$1,152 - $1,499 body only

$1,421 - $1,849 with 18-135mm lens

Cross type focus points Many more cross-type focus points
GPS Has a GPS
Screen size Significantly smaller screen

discussion

Nikon D7100
D7100
Nikon

Report a correction
Nikon D400
D400
Nikon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments