Updated (March 2012): Compare the Nikon D3200 vs Sony SLT A35

Nikon D3200 vs Sony SLT A35

Winner
Nikon D3200

100

Sony SLT A35

88

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Nikon D3200

High true resolution
True resolution
24.1 MP
24p movies
Supports 24p
For that film look
Almost no delay when powering up
Startup delay
400 ms startup delay
Really small
Size
Prosumer size (125×96×77 mm)
 

Reasons to buy the Sony SLT A35

Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Sensor shift
Continuous shooting
Rapid fire
5.5 fps
Shutter lag
Barely any delay taking photos
223 ms shutter lag
Weight
Light-weight
415 g

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Nikon D3200.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Sony SLT A35.

competitors

Nikon D3200 Competitors

Nikon D5100

Nikon D5100

Entry-level DSLR

$350 body only

Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
Battery life Longer battery life
True resolution Much lower true resolution
Nikon D3400

Nikon D3400

Entry-level DSLR

$326 body only

$397 with 18-55mm lens

Movie format Lower frame rate movies
Battery life Significantly longer battery life
External mic jack Lacks an external mic jack
Nikon D3300

Nikon D3300

Entry-level DSLR

$397 with 18-55mm lens

Movie format Lower frame rate movies
Viewfinder size Larger viewfinder
Lowest price Slightly more expensive

Sony SLT A35 Competitors

Canon EOS M5

Canon EOS M5

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$829 body only

$949 with 15-45mm lens

Screen resolution Much higher resolution screen
Screen size Much larger screen
Lens availability Significantly fewer lenses available
Sony Alpha NEX-5

Sony Alpha NEX-5

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$450 with 18-55mm lens

Size Much smaller
Thickness Much thinner
Viewfinder No viewfinder
Canon EOS 60D

Canon EOS 60D

Pro DSLR

$2,568 body only

$1,499 with 18-200mm lens

Viewfinder Has an optical viewfinder
Supports 24p Supports 24p
Image stabilization No image stabilization

discussion

Nikon D3200
D3200
Nikon

Report a correction
Sony SLT A35
SLT A35
Sony

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments