Panasonic Lumix TZ40 vs Nikon Coolpix S9500

Winner
Panasonic Lumix TZ40

62

Nikon Coolpix S9500

58

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix TZ40

Really small
Size
Compact (105×59×28 mm)
Touch screen
Touch screen
Fewer buttons
Thin
Thickness
1.1"
Light-weight
Weight
198 g
 

Reasons to buy the Nikon Coolpix S9500

High-speed framerate
High speed movies
240 fps
Screen type
OLED Screen
Bright and vivid
Focus points
Many focus points
99
Macro focus
Great macro
1.0 cm

galleries

Explore our gallery of 40 sample photos taken by the Nikon Coolpix S9500.
Explore our gallery of 49 sample photos taken by the Panasonic Lumix TZ40.

competitors

Panasonic Lumix TZ40 Competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ60

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ60

Travel zoom

$251

Zoom Significantly more zoom
Supports RAW Shoots RAW
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS100 (Lumix DMC-TZ100)

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS100 (Lumix DMC-TZ100)

Travel zoom

Continuous shooting Shoots much faster
Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS60 (Lumix DMC-TZ80)

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS60 (Lumix DMC-TZ80)

Travel zoom

Movie format Higher resolution movies
Continuous shooting Shoots much faster
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

Nikon Coolpix S9500 Competitors

Nikon Coolpix S9900

Nikon Coolpix S9900

Travel zoom

$249

Zoom Significantly more zoom
Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Nikon Coolpix S9700

Nikon Coolpix S9700

Travel zoom

$229

Zoom Significantly more zoom
Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
3D Doesn't take 3D photos
Nikon Coolpix S7000

Nikon Coolpix S7000

Travel zoom

$123 - $197

Size Smaller
Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

discussion

Panasonic Lumix TZ40
Lumix TZ40
Panasonic

Report a correction
Nikon Coolpix S9500
Coolpix S9500
Nikon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments