Updated (January 2013): Compare the Nikon Coolpix P520 vs Nikon Coolpix S9500

Nikon Coolpix P520 vs Nikon Coolpix S9500

Winner
Nikon Coolpix P520

41

Nikon Coolpix S9500

33

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Nikon Coolpix P520

Large screen
Screen size
3.2"
Flip-out screen
Screen flips out
Great for movies
Great viewfinder
Viewfinder
Digital
High speed movies
High-speed framerate
120 fps
 

Reasons to buy the Nikon Coolpix S9500

Size
Really small
Compact (110×60×31 mm)
High-speed framerate
High speed movies
240 fps
Screen type
OLED Screen
Bright and vivid
Focus points
Many focus points
99

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Nikon Coolpix P520.
Explore our gallery of 40 sample photos taken by the Nikon Coolpix S9500.

competitors

Nikon Coolpix P520 Competitors

Nikon Coolpix P530

Nikon Coolpix P530

Super zoom

$180 - $329

Battery life Longer battery life
Size Slightly smaller
3D Doesn't take 3D photos
Nikon Coolpix B500

Nikon Coolpix B500

Super zoom

$199 - $257

Battery life Much longer battery life
Wide angle Better wide angle
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Nikon Coolpix P610

Nikon Coolpix P610

Super zoom

$299 - $400

Zoom Much more zoom
Battery life Significantly longer battery life
Screen size Significantly smaller screen

Nikon Coolpix S9500 Competitors

Nikon Coolpix S9900

Nikon Coolpix S9900

Travel zoom

$259

Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Nikon Coolpix A900

Nikon Coolpix A900

Travel zoom

$397

Movie format Higher resolution movies
Zoom More zoom
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Nikon Coolpix S7000

Nikon Coolpix S7000

Travel zoom

$160 - $227

Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
Fastest shutter speed Much faster max shutter speed
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

discussion

Nikon Coolpix P520
Coolpix P520
Nikon

Report a correction
Nikon Coolpix S9500
Coolpix S9500
Nikon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments