Updated (January 2013): Compare the Nikon Coolpix L610 vs Nikon Coolpix S6500

Nikon Coolpix S6500 vs Nikon Coolpix L610

Tie
Nikon Coolpix S6500

46

Nikon Coolpix L610

45

Tie

Reasons to buy the Nikon Coolpix S6500

Really small
Size
Compact (95×58×26 mm)
Thin
Thickness
1"
Light-weight
Weight
153 g
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Lens
 

Reasons to buy the Nikon Coolpix L610

Panorama
In-camera panoramas
Stitches together multiple photos into a panorama
3D
Takes 3D photos
View photos in 3D on 3D televisions
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Lens
Sensor type
CMOS Sensor
Better in low light

galleries

Explore our gallery of 9 sample photos taken by the Nikon Coolpix L610.
Explore our gallery of 2 sample photos taken by the Nikon Coolpix S6500.

competitors

Nikon Coolpix S6500 Competitors

Nikon Coolpix S7000

Nikon Coolpix S7000

Travel zoom

$169 - $227

Zoom Slightly more zoom
Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
Aperture Narrower aperture
Kodak PixPro FZ151

Kodak PixPro FZ151

Travel zoom

$155

Wide angle Better wide angle
Battery life Longer battery life
Sensor type Has a CCD-family sensor
Nikon Coolpix S6800

Nikon Coolpix S6800

Travel zoom

$129

Battery life Slightly longer battery life
Lowest price Cheaper
Aperture Slightly narrower aperture

Nikon Coolpix L610 Competitors

Nikon Coolpix L340

Nikon Coolpix L340

Super zoom

$198

Wide angle Much better wide angle
Battery life Much longer battery life
Image stabilization No image stabilization
Canon PowerShot SX610 HS

Canon PowerShot SX610 HS

Travel zoom

$197 - $230

Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Battery life Significantly longer battery life
Aperture Narrower aperture
Nikon Coolpix L810

Nikon Coolpix L810

Super zoom

$179

Wide angle Better wide angle
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Sensor type Has a CCD-family sensor

discussion

Nikon Coolpix S6500
Coolpix S6500
Nikon

Report a correction
Nikon Coolpix L610
Coolpix L610
Nikon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments