Nikon Coolpix AW120 vs Nikon Coolpix AW110

Winner
Nikon Coolpix AW120

69

Nikon Coolpix AW110

61

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Nikon Coolpix AW120

Wide aperture
Aperture
f/2.8
High resolution screen
Screen resolution
921k dots
Great battery life
Battery life
350 shots
Fast shutter speed
Fastest shutter speed
1/4000 of a second
 

Reasons to buy the Nikon Coolpix AW110

3D
Takes 3D photos
View photos in 3D on 3D televisions
Built-in flash
Built-in flash
Usually standard
High-speed framerate
High speed movies
240 fps
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Lens

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Nikon Coolpix AW110.
Explore our gallery of 1 sample photo taken by the Nikon Coolpix AW120.

competitors

Nikon Coolpix AW120 Competitors

Nikon AW130

Nikon AW130

Waterproof

$268 - $347

Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
Battery life Longer battery life
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon PowerShot D30

Canon PowerShot D30

Waterproof

$239 - $299

Supports 24p Supports 24p
Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
Aperture Significantly narrower aperture
Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870

Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870

Waterproof

$229

Wide angle Significantly better wide angle
Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

Nikon Coolpix AW110 Competitors

Nikon AW130

Nikon AW130

Waterproof

$268 - $347

Aperture Significantly wider aperture
Wide angle Much better wide angle
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Nikon Coolpix AW100

Nikon Coolpix AW100

Waterproof

$289

Size Smaller
Thickness Thinner
Screen type Doesn't have an OLED screen
Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870

Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870

Waterproof

$229

Wide angle Much better wide angle
Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

discussion

Nikon Coolpix AW120
Coolpix AW120
Nikon

Report a correction
Nikon Coolpix AW110
Coolpix AW110
Nikon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments