Updated (January 2012): Compare the Nikon Coolpix AW100 vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS4

Panasonic Lumix TS4 vs Nikon Coolpix AW100

Tie
Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS4

71

Nikon Coolpix AW100

71

Tie

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix TS4

Long exposures
Longest exposure
60 seconds
Built-in flash
Built-in flash
Usually standard
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Lens
Built-in GPS
GPS
Great for travel
 

Reasons to buy the Nikon Coolpix AW100

Screen size
Large screen
3"
Size
Really small
Compact (110×65×23 mm)
High-speed framerate
High speed movies
240 fps
Thickness
Thin
0.9"

galleries

Explore our gallery of 21 sample photos taken by the Nikon Coolpix AW100.
Explore our gallery of 3 sample photos taken by the Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS4.

competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS4 Competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS30

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS30

Waterproof

$148 - $168

Wide angle Significantly better wide angle
Size Significantly smaller
Movie format Lower resolution movies
Panasonic Lumix TS5

Panasonic Lumix TS5

Waterproof

$386

Screen size Significantly larger screen
Sensor type Has a CMOS-family sensor
Size Larger
Fujifilm FinePix XP100

Fujifilm FinePix XP100

Waterproof

$220

Sensor type Has a CMOS-family sensor
Continuous shooting Shoots faster
Aperture Narrower aperture

Nikon Coolpix AW100 Competitors

Nikon AW130

Nikon AW130

Waterproof

$251 - $347

Screen type Has an OLED screen
Aperture Significantly wider aperture
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Nikon Coolpix W100

Nikon Coolpix W100

Digicam

$157

Aperture Wider aperture
Fastest shutter speed Much faster max shutter speed
Size Much larger
Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS30

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS30

Waterproof

$148 - $168

Wide angle Significantly better wide angle
Size Smaller
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

discussion

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS4
Lumix TS4
Panasonic

Report a correction
Nikon Coolpix AW100
Coolpix AW100
Nikon

Report a correction

Showing 1 comments

Greatintellect (8:35 AM, April 03, 2012)
Why would you assume a CMOS image sensor is better than CCD?