Updated (January 2012): Compare the Nikon Coolpix AW100 vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-FT20

Nikon Coolpix AW100 vs Panasonic Lumix FT20

Winner
Nikon Coolpix AW100

61

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FT20

56

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Nikon Coolpix AW100

Large screen
Screen size
3"
High speed movies
High-speed framerate
240 fps
CMOS Sensor
Sensor type
Better in low light
In-camera HDR
HDR
Combines multiple exposures
 

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix FT20

Size
Really small
Super compact (101×58×19 mm)
Thickness
Thin
0.7"
Weight
Light-weight
142 g
Built-in flash
Built-in flash
Usually standard

galleries

Explore our gallery of 21 sample photos taken by the Nikon Coolpix AW100.

competitors

Nikon Coolpix AW100 Competitors

Nikon AW130

Nikon AW130

Waterproof

$268 - $347

Aperture Significantly wider aperture
Screen type Has an OLED screen
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Fujifilm XP90

Fujifilm XP90

Waterproof

$159 - $177

Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Continuous shooting Shoots significantly faster
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Nikon Coolpix AW120

Nikon Coolpix AW120

Waterproof

$260

Aperture Significantly wider aperture
Screen type Has an OLED screen
Size Larger

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FT20 Competitors

Nikon Coolpix S33

Nikon Coolpix S33

Waterproof

$116 - $147

Aperture Wider aperture
Sensor type Has a CMOS-family sensor
Wide angle Much worse wide angle
Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860

Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860

Waterproof

$179 - $229

Wide angle Much better wide angle
Screen size Much larger screen
Size Much larger
Panasonic Lumix FT25

Panasonic Lumix FT25

Waterproof

$148

Longest exposure Much longer exposures
Size Slightly larger

discussion

Nikon Coolpix AW100
Coolpix AW100
Nikon

Report a correction
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FT20
Lumix FT20
Panasonic

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments