Updated (August 2011): Compare the Nikon Coolpix AW100 vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS3

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS3 vs Nikon Coolpix AW100

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS3


Nikon Coolpix AW100



Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS3

Really small
Compact (104×64×28 mm)
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Lens
Built-in GPS
Great for travel
Great at the beach

Reasons to buy the Nikon Coolpix AW100

Really small
Compact (110×65×23 mm)
Sensor type
CMOS Sensor
Better in low light
178 g


Explore our gallery of 21 sample photos taken by the Nikon Coolpix AW100.
Explore our gallery of 31 sample photos taken by the Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS3.


Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS3 Competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS4

Panasonic Lumix TS4


Panasonic Lumix TS5

Panasonic Lumix TS5



Fujifilm GFX 50R



Nikon Coolpix AW100 Competitors

Nikon Coolpix W100

Nikon Coolpix W100


$99 - $157

Fujifilm FinePix XP120

Fujifilm FinePix XP120


$100 - $109

Nikon Coolpix A100

Nikon Coolpix A100




Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS3
Lumix DMC-TS3

Report a correction
Nikon Coolpix AW100
Coolpix AW100

Report a correction

Showing 8 comments

BFox (5:26 PM, June 28, 2012)
I own the Panasonic.  Great pics, but on our second use we took it snorkeling and it stopped working.  We took the instruction book and did everything it said to do to insure that it was water-tight, but it failed after 5 pictures.  We sent it in through Panasonic's warranty program and they called to let me know that it's not covered so I need to pay $180 to have it fixed.  They are stating that I did not follow the instructions for waterproofing.  $300 for 5 pictures is pretty expensive, so I am going back to Nikon.
Asmith (3:42 PM, February 17, 2012)
I have an aw100.  Really like it but the shake feature cannot be turned off (you can adjust the sensitivity) but it still didn't work for me. This is a huge disadvantage when passing the camera around to share photos or in a high vibration environment.  I'm thinking about taking it back and getting the Panasonic.  Any thoughts.  Some specs are different but are they ones that matter to picture quality except at the extremes?
I'm a pretty big Nikon fan having had several of their SLRs in the past this is pretty disappointing.  
Stig (11:55 AM, January 31, 2012)
I had 4 Panasonic compact cameras before I got the AW100.
I liked the quality of the photo for the Panasonic. All 4 had problems
with me, traveling all over the world, taking them swimming, too.
Panasonic are not so robust a camera, in fact all 4 stopped working, due to
shock, water, use. I find that Panasonic is not a high quality product,
not made by a company that knows about photo. Just thing, its not possible to
attach a cord around the neck, only a strap for the hand. So poor.

Now I am pleased with the AW100, which is more robust, can be carried around the
neck, is absolutely waterproof - so far. Especially the photos taken by night
are fantastic, and the camera is much smaller. Yet - the battery will only last for
one days shooting.

Stig, Denmark
Avatar for Snapsort Snapsort (3:13 PM, January 16, 2012)
Thanks for pointing that out Nhann, a mistake on our part.  We normally use "weather sealed" just for DSLRs, and "waterproof" for point and shoot cameras.  We'll get this fixed up!
Nhann (10:56 AM, January 16, 2012)
Comparison states that a common weakness of these 2 cameras is that neither is weather sealed and need to be sheltered from weather... They are both fully sealed units that can be taken underwater... I think the site researchers and editors need to lift their game after making such a blatant and basic error.
Heltonsjw (11:25 PM, December 11, 2011)
Which is best for underwater use, snorkeling, diving etc?
Gusgentzsch (4:49 AM, December 10, 2011)
What I learned/reviewed from the Internet I ordered the Nikon from Costco.
Had a Nikon 40 years ago, it was the best. I think this will be even better.
Guest (6:15 PM, December 08, 2011)
They both have GPS!