Nikon Coolpix AW100 vs Olympus Tough TG-830 iHS

Winner
Nikon Coolpix AW100

71

Olympus Tough TG-830 iHS

65

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Nikon Coolpix AW100

Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Lens
Large screen
Screen size
3"
High speed movies
High-speed framerate
240 fps
CMOS Sensor
Sensor type
Better in low light
 

Reasons to buy the Olympus Tough TG-830 iHS

Fastest shutter speed
Fast shutter speed
1/2000 of a second
Screen size
Large screen
3"
High-speed framerate
High speed movies
240 fps
Sensor type
CMOS Sensor
Better in low light

galleries

Explore our gallery of 21 sample photos taken by the Nikon Coolpix AW100.
Explore our gallery of 16 sample photos taken by the Olympus Tough TG-830 iHS.

competitors

Nikon Coolpix AW100 Competitors

Nikon Coolpix S33

Nikon Coolpix S33

Waterproof

$83 - $109

Aperture Wider aperture
Continuous shooting Shoots slightly faster
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Nikon AW130

Nikon AW130

Waterproof

$264 - $347

Screen type Has an OLED screen
Aperture Significantly wider aperture
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS30

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS30

Waterproof

$134 - $138

Wide angle Significantly better wide angle
Size Smaller
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

Olympus Tough TG-830 iHS Competitors

Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870

Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870

Waterproof

$279

Wide angle Much better wide angle
Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon PowerShot D30

Canon PowerShot D30

Waterproof

$245 - $299

Supports 24p Supports 24p
Longest exposure Longer exposures
Light sensitivity Worse maximum light sensitivity
Olympus TG-820 iHS

Olympus TG-820

Waterproof

$260

Size Significantly smaller
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

discussion

Nikon Coolpix AW100
Coolpix AW100
Nikon

Report a correction
Olympus Tough TG-830 iHS
Tough TG-830 iHS
Olympus

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments