Nikon Coolpix AW100 vs Olympus Tough TG-830 iHS

Winner
Nikon Coolpix AW100

71

Olympus Tough TG-830 iHS

65

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Nikon Coolpix AW100

Really small
Size
Compact (110×65×23 mm)
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Lens
Thin
Thickness
0.9"
Built-in flash
Built-in flash
Usually standard
 

Reasons to buy the Olympus Tough TG-830 iHS

Fastest shutter speed
Fast shutter speed
1/2000 of a second
Built-in flash
Built-in flash
Usually standard
Screen size
Large screen
3"
High-speed framerate
High speed movies
240 fps

galleries

Explore our gallery of 21 sample photos taken by the Nikon Coolpix AW100.
Explore our gallery of 16 sample photos taken by the Olympus Tough TG-830 iHS.

competitors

Nikon Coolpix AW100 Competitors

Nikon Coolpix S33

Nikon Coolpix S33

Waterproof

$83 - $120

Aperture Wider aperture
Fastest shutter speed Much faster max shutter speed
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Nikon AW130

Nikon AW130

Waterproof

$249 - $347

Screen type Has an OLED screen
Aperture Significantly wider aperture
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS30

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS30

Waterproof

$148 - $168

Wide angle Significantly better wide angle
Size Smaller
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

Olympus Tough TG-830 iHS Competitors

Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870

Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870

Waterproof

$337

Wide angle Much better wide angle
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Olympus TG-820 iHS

Olympus TG-820

Waterproof

$230

Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Size Significantly smaller
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Olympus Tough TG-850 iHS

Olympus Tough TG-850 iHS

Waterproof

$343

Wide angle Much better wide angle
Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
GPS No built-in GPS

discussion

Nikon Coolpix AW100
Coolpix AW100
Nikon

Report a correction
Olympus Tough TG-830 iHS
Tough TG-830 iHS
Olympus

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments