Nikon Coolpix AW100 vs Nikon Coolpix L20

Winner
Nikon Coolpix AW100

42
Nikon Coolpix L20

33

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Nikon Coolpix AW100

Full HD
Movie format
1080p @ 30fps
High speed movies
High-speed framerate
240 fps
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Lens
CMOS Sensor
Sensor type
Better in low light
 

Reasons to buy the Nikon Coolpix L20

Weight
 Light-weight
135 g
Screen size
 Large screen
3"
More detailed differences and similarities →

galleries

Explore our gallery of 21 sample photos taken by the Nikon Coolpix AW100.
Explore our gallery of 30 sample photos taken by the Nikon Coolpix L20.

competitors

Nikon Coolpix AW100 Competitors

Nikon Coolpix AW120

Nikon Coolpix AW120

Waterproof

$229

Wide angle Much better wide angle
Screen type Has an OLED screen
Size Larger
Compare the Coolpix AW120 vs the Coolpix AW100
Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS30

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS30

Waterproof

$138 - $168

Wide angle Significantly better wide angle
Size Smaller
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Compare the Lumix DMC-TS30 vs the Coolpix AW100
Nikon AW130

Nikon AW130

Waterproof

$279

Wide angle Much better wide angle
Screen type Has an OLED screen
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Compare the AW130 vs the Coolpix AW100

Nikon Coolpix L20 Competitors

Nikon Coolpix L31

Nikon Coolpix L31

Compact

$99

Wide angle Much better wide angle
Image stabilization Image stabilization
Screen size Much smaller screen
Compare the Coolpix L31 vs the Coolpix L20
Samsung SL30

Samsung SL30

Compact

$94

Size Smaller
Aperture Wider aperture
Screen size Much smaller screen
Compare the SL30 vs the Coolpix L20
Nikon Coolpix S6300

Nikon Coolpix S6300

Travel zoom

$220

Image stabilization Image stabilization
Wide angle Much better wide angle
Screen size Much smaller screen
Compare the Coolpix S6300 vs the Coolpix L20
More detailed differences and similarities →

discussion

Nikon Coolpix AW100
Coolpix AW100
Nikon

Report a correction
Nikon Coolpix L20
Coolpix L20
Nikon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments

More detailed differences and similarities →