Nikon 1 V3 vs Nikon 1 J4

Winner
Nikon 1 V3

52

Nikon 1 J4

47

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Nikon 1 V3

Great viewfinder
Viewfinder
Digital
Flip-out screen
Screen flips out
Great for movies
External flash
External flash
Better lighting
High resolution screen
Screen resolution
1,037k dots
 

Reasons to buy the Nikon 1 J4

Badge
Phase detection autofocus
fast and accurate
Size
Really small
Compact (100×60×29 mm)
Thickness
Thin
1.1"
Weight
Light-weight
192 g

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Nikon 1 J4.

competitors

Nikon 1 V3 Competitors

Nikon 1 J5

Nikon 1 J5

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$380 - $497 with 10-30mm lens

Color depth Better color depth
Low light performance Much lower noise at high ISO
High-speed framerate Lower speed movies
Sony Alpha A6000

Sony Alpha A6000

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$498 body only

$592 - $598 with 16-50mm lens

Low light performance Much lower noise at high ISO
Image stabilization Image stabilization
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Nikon 1 V1

Nikon 1 V1

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$495 body only

$399 with 10-30mm lens

Color depth Better color depth
External mic jack Has an external mic jack
Low light performance Significantly more noise at high ISO

Nikon 1 J4 Competitors

Nikon 1 J5

Nikon 1 J5

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$380 - $497 with 10-30mm lens

Color depth Better color depth
Low light performance Significantly lower noise at high ISO
High-speed framerate Lower speed movies
Samsung NX Mini

Samsung NX Mini

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$279 body only

$485 with 9mm lens

Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
True resolution Higher true resolution
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Fujifilm X-E1

Fujifilm X-E1

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$519 body only

$849 with 18-55mm lens

Viewfinder Has a viewfinder
Supports 24p Supports 24p
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

discussion

Nikon 1 V3
1 V3
Nikon

Report a correction
Nikon 1 J4
1 J4
Nikon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments