Nikon 1 J2 vs Pentax Q

Winner
Nikon 1 J2

42

Pentax Q

37

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Nikon 1 J2

High resolution screen
Screen resolution
921k dots
High speed movies
High-speed framerate
1,200 fps
Great color depth
Color depth
21.3 bits
Rapid fire
Continuous shooting
60 fps
 

Reasons to buy the Pentax Q

Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Sensor shift
Badge
Built-in focus motor
Autofocuses with more lenses
External flash
External flash
Better lighting
HDR
In-camera HDR
Combines multiple exposures

galleries

Explore our gallery of 19 sample photos taken by the Nikon 1 J2.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Pentax Q.

competitors

Nikon 1 J2 Competitors

Nikon 1 J1

Nikon 1 J1

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$184 with 10-30mm lens

Color depth Better color depth
Overall image quality Slightly better image quality
HDR Lacks in-camera HDR
Nikon 1 J4

Nikon 1 J4

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$349 with 10-30mm lens

Touch screen Has a touch screen
True resolution Significantly higher true resolution
Autofocus Slower video autofocus
Nikon 1 J3

Nikon 1 J3

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$380 with 10-30mm lens

True resolution Higher true resolution
Low light performance Slightly lower noise at high ISO
Color depth Worse color depth

Pentax Q Competitors

Pentax Q-S1

Pentax Q-S1

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$223 body only

$298 - $370 with 5-15mm lens

Supports 24p Supports 24p
Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
Thickness Slightly thicker
Pentax Q10

Pentax Q10

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$207 body only

$603 with 5-15mm, 15-45mm lenses

Color depth Better color depth
Overall image quality Slightly better image quality
Dynamic range Less dynamic range
Pentax Q7

Pentax Q7

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$255 body only

$389 with 5-15mm lens

Supports 24p Supports 24p
Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
Movie continuous focus Doesn't focus continuously recording movies

discussion

Nikon 1 J2
1 J2
Nikon

Report a correction
Pentax Q
Q
Pentax

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments