Leica D-LUX 5 vs Sony NEX 7

Leica D-LUX 5
Sony NEX-7

Reasons to buy the Leica D-LUX 5

Wide angle lens
Wide angle
24 mm
Really small
Size
Compact (110×65×25 mm)
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Lens
Thin
Thickness
1"
 

Reasons to buy the Sony NEX 7

True resolution
High true resolution
24 MP
Startup delay
Almost no delay when powering up
1200 ms startup delay
Screen flips out
Flip-out screen
Great for movies
Movie continuous focus
Movie continuous focus
Makes it easy to get in-focus movies

galleries

Explore our gallery of 17 sample photos taken by the Leica D-LUX 5.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Sony NEX-7.

competitors

Leica D-LUX 5 Competitors

Fujifilm X-E1

Fujifilm X-E1

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$519 body only

$889 with 18-55mm lens

Supports 24p Supports 24p
External mic jack Has an external mic jack
Image stabilization No image stabilization
Leica D-Lux (Typ 109)

Leica D-Lux (Typ 109)

Boutique

$1,095

Movie format Higher resolution movies
Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
Size Larger
Fujifilm X-E2

Fujifilm X-E2

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$499 body only

$1,043 with 18-55mm lens

Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
External mic jack Has an external mic jack
Image stabilization No image stabilization

Sony NEX-7 Competitors

Sony Alpha A6000

Sony Alpha A6000

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$470 - $548 body only

$547 - $648 with 16-50mm lens

Image stabilization Image stabilization
Focus points Significantly more focus points
Size Slightly larger
Sony Alpha NEX-6

Sony Alpha NEX-6

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$550 body only

Focus points More focus points
Weight Slightly lighter
External mic jack Lacks an external mic jack
Sony Alpha a6500

Sony Alpha a6500

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$1,398 body only

$1,498 with 16-50mm lens

Image stabilization Image stabilization
Focus points Many more focus points
Size Larger

discussion

Leica D-LUX 5
D-LUX 5
Leica

Report a correction
Sony NEX-7
NEX 7
Sony

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments