Sony A7R vs Leica M Typ 240

Winner
Sony A7R

98

Leica M Typ 240

84

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Sony A7R

Low noise at high ISO
Low light performance
2,746 ISO
Great image quality
Overall image quality
95.0
Great color depth
Color depth
26 bits
High true resolution
True resolution
36.2 MP
 

Reasons to buy the Leica M Typ 240

Startup delay
Almost no delay when powering up
750 ms startup delay
Size
Really small
Standard size (139×80×42 mm)
Thickness
Thin
1.7"
Longest exposure
Long exposures
60 seconds

competitors

Sony A7R Competitors

Sony Alpha 7 II

Sony Alpha 7 II

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$1,400 - $1,498 body only

$1,650 - $1,798 with 28-70mm lens

Image stabilization Image stabilization
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
True resolution Significantly lower true resolution
Sony A7S

Sony A7S

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$2,008 - $2,198 body only

$2,696 with 28-70mm lens

Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
Low light performance Lower noise at high ISO
True resolution Much lower true resolution
Sony A7

Sony A7

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$1,098 - $3,198 body only

$1,398 with 28-70mm lens

Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Focus points More focus points
Low light performance More noise at high ISO

Leica M Typ 240 Competitors

Leica M (Typ 262)

Leica M (Typ 262)

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$5,069 - $5,395 body only

$5,995 with 50mm lens

GPS Has a GPS
Lowest price Cheaper
Live view No live view
Leica Q (Typ 116)

Leica Q (Typ 116)

Boutique

$4,250 - $4,495

Touch screen Has a touch screen
Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
Supports 24p No 24p support
Fujifilm X-Pro2

Fujifilm X-Pro2

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$1,549 body only

$1,949 with 35mm lens

Screen resolution Much higher resolution screen
External mic jack Has an external mic jack
Viewfinder coverage Much less viewfinder coverage

discussion

Sony A7R
A7R
Sony

Report a correction
Leica M Typ 240
M Typ 240
Leica

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments