Nikon D7000 vs Kodak EasyShare Z8612 IS

Winner
Nikon D7000

56

Kodak EasyShare Z8612 IS

38

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Nikon D7000

Weather sealed
Weather sealed
Shoot in extreme weather
Great viewfinder coverage
Viewfinder coverage
100%
Movie continuous focus
Movie continuous focus
Makes it easy to get in-focus movies
Built-in focus motor
Badge
Autofocuses with more lenses
 

Reasons to buy the Kodak EasyShare Z8612 IS

Size
Really small
Standard size (104×66×71 mm)
Weight
Light-weight
340 g

galleries

Explore our gallery of 17 sample photos taken by the Kodak EasyShare Z8612 IS.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Nikon D7000.

competitors

Nikon D7000 Competitors

Nikon D7200

Nikon D7200

Entry-level DSLR

$799 - $997 body only

$1,048 - $1,297 with 18-140mm lens

Overall image quality Much better image quality
Screen size Significantly larger screen
Movie continuous focus Doesn't focus continuously recording movies
Nikon D7100

Nikon D7100

Entry-level DSLR

$629 - $679 body only

$949 with 18-140mm lens

Overall image quality Better image quality
Screen size Significantly larger screen
Battery life Slightly shorter battery life
Nikon D5200

Nikon D5200

Entry-level DSLR

$430 body only

$520 with 18-55mm lens

Overall image quality Significantly better image quality
Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
Built-in focus motor Doesn't have a built-in focus motor

Kodak EasyShare Z8612 IS Competitors

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX10

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX10

Travel zoom

$213

Image stabilization Image stabilization
Wide angle Much better wide angle
Aperture Narrower aperture
Kodak EasyShare Z812 IS

Kodak EasyShare Z812 IS

Super zoom

$387

Image stabilization Image stabilization
Movie format Higher resolution movies
Size Slightly larger
Olympus SP-610 UZ

Olympus SP-610 UZ

Super zoom

$189

Image stabilization Image stabilization
Wide angle Much better wide angle
Aperture Narrower aperture

discussion

Nikon D7000
D7000
Nikon

Report a correction
Kodak EasyShare Z8612 IS
EasyShare Z8612 IS
Kodak

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments