Nikon D7000 vs Kodak EasyShare Z8612 IS

Winner
Nikon D7000

59

Kodak EasyShare Z8612 IS

40

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Nikon D7000

Weather sealed
Weather sealed
Shoot in extreme weather
Wide dynamic range
Dynamic range
13.9 EV
Great viewfinder coverage
Viewfinder coverage
100%
Movie continuous focus
Movie continuous focus
Makes it easy to get in-focus movies
 

Reasons to buy the Kodak EasyShare Z8612 IS

Size
Really small
Standard size (104×66×71 mm)
Weight
Light-weight
340 g

galleries

Explore our gallery of 17 sample photos taken by the Kodak EasyShare Z8612 IS.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Nikon D7000.

competitors

Nikon D7000 Competitors

Nikon D7100

Nikon D7100

Entry-level DSLR

$697 - $699 body only

$997 with 18-105mm lens

Screen size Significantly larger screen
Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
Battery life Slightly shorter battery life
Nikon D5300

Nikon D5300

Entry-level DSLR

$396 - $597 body only

$469 - $697 with 18-55mm lens

Screen size Significantly larger screen
Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
Viewfinder coverage Much less viewfinder coverage
Nikon D7200

Nikon D7200

Entry-level DSLR

$781 - $997 body only

$1,100 - $1,297 with 18-140mm lens

Screen size Significantly larger screen
Overall image quality Better image quality
Movie continuous focus Doesn't focus continuously recording movies

Kodak EasyShare Z8612 IS Competitors

Canon PowerShot SX610 HS

Canon PowerShot SX610 HS

Travel zoom

$168 - $249

Image stabilization Image stabilization
Wide angle Much better wide angle
Aperture Significantly narrower aperture
Fujifilm FinePix S6000fd

Fujifilm FinePix S6000fd

Pro digicam

$634

Wide angle Much better wide angle
Viewfinder Has a viewfinder
Size Much larger
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX10

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX10

Travel zoom

$183

Image stabilization Image stabilization
Wide angle Much better wide angle
Aperture Narrower aperture

discussion

Nikon D7000
D7000
Nikon

Report a correction
Kodak EasyShare Z8612 IS
EasyShare Z8612 IS
Kodak

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments