Kodak Easyshare Z990 MAX vs Nikon D5100

Winner
Kodak Easyshare Z990 MAX

56

Nikon D5100

54

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Kodak Easyshare Z990 MAX

Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Lens
In-camera panoramas
Panorama
Stitches together multiple photos into a panorama
In-camera HDR
HDR
Combines multiple exposures
 

Reasons to buy the Nikon D5100

Dynamic range
Wide dynamic range
13.6 EV
Screen flips out
Flip-out screen
Great for movies
Movie continuous focus
Movie continuous focus
Makes it easy to get in-focus movies
External mic jack
External mic jack
Record higher quality audio with a microphone

galleries

Explore our gallery of 44 sample photos taken by the Kodak Easyshare Z990 MAX.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Nikon D5100.

competitors

Kodak Easyshare Z990 MAX Competitors

Samsung WB800F

Samsung WB800F

Travel zoom

$380

Size Significantly smaller
Wide angle Significantly better wide angle
Macro focus Much worse macro capability
Kodak PixPro AZ361

Kodak PixPro AZ361

Super zoom

$230

Wide angle Better wide angle
Size Smaller
Macro focus Much worse macro capability
Nikon Coolpix P500

Nikon Coolpix P500

Super zoom

$470

High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies
Wide angle Significantly better wide angle
Aperture Narrower aperture

Nikon D5100 Competitors

Nikon D3300

Nikon D3300

Entry-level DSLR

$460 body only

$369 - $447 with 18-55mm lens

Panorama Can create panoramas in-camera
True resolution Higher true resolution
Screen flips out Screen does not flip out
Nikon D3200

Nikon D3200

Entry-level DSLR

$350 body only

$390 - $409 with 18-55mm lens

True resolution Higher true resolution
Startup delay Slightly less startup delay
Screen flips out Screen does not flip out
Nikon D5300

Nikon D5300

Entry-level DSLR

$597 body only

$478 - $697 with 18-55mm lens

Screen size Significantly larger screen
GPS Has a GPS
Battery life Slightly shorter battery life

discussion

Kodak Easyshare Z990 MAX
Easyshare Z990 MAX
Kodak

Report a correction
Nikon D5100
D5100
Nikon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments