Kodak Easyshare Z990 MAX vs Kodak EasyShare Z981

Winner
Kodak Easyshare Z990 MAX

50

Kodak EasyShare Z981

45

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Kodak Easyshare Z990 MAX

CMOS Sensor
Sensor type
Better in low light
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Lens
Great viewfinder
Viewfinder
Digital
Fast shutter speed
Fastest shutter speed
1/2000 of a second
 

Reasons to buy the Kodak EasyShare Z981

Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Lens
Viewfinder
Great viewfinder
Digital
Fastest shutter speed
Fast shutter speed
1/2000 of a second

galleries

Explore our gallery of 44 sample photos taken by the Kodak Easyshare Z990 MAX.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Kodak EasyShare Z981.

competitors

Kodak Easyshare Z990 MAX Competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200

Super zoom

$425

High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies
External mic jack Has an external mic jack
Zoom Less zoom
Nikon Coolpix B700

Nikon Coolpix B700

Super zoom

$415 - $447

Zoom Much more zoom
Movie format Higher resolution movies
Aperture Narrower aperture
Canon EOS Rebel T6

Canon EOS Rebel T6

Entry-level DSLR

$318 - $649 body only

$380 - $449 with 18-55mm lens

Supports 24p Supports 24p
Autofocus Faster autofocus
Continuous shooting Shoots slightly slower

Kodak EasyShare Z981 Competitors

Kodak PixPro AZ251

Kodak PixPro AZ251

Super zoom

$212

Wide angle Better wide angle
Size Smaller
Fastest shutter speed Much slower max shutter speed
Nikon D3300

Nikon D3300

Entry-level DSLR

$447 body only

$394 - $447 with 18-55mm lens

Screen resolution Much higher resolution screen
External mic jack Has an external mic jack
Image stabilization No image stabilization
Canon PowerShot SX20 IS

Canon PowerShot SX20 IS

Super zoom

$514

Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
External flash Supports an external flash
Screen size Much smaller screen

discussion

Kodak Easyshare Z990 MAX
Easyshare Z990 MAX
Kodak

Report a correction
Kodak EasyShare Z981
EasyShare Z981
Kodak

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments