Kodak Easyshare Z990 MAX vs Kodak EasyShare Z980

Winner
Kodak Easyshare Z990 MAX

50

Kodak EasyShare Z980

43

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Kodak Easyshare Z990 MAX

Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Lens
CMOS Sensor
Sensor type
Better in low light
In-camera HDR
HDR
Combines multiple exposures
In-camera panoramas
Panorama
Stitches together multiple photos into a panorama
 

Reasons to buy the Kodak EasyShare Z980

External flash
External flash
Better lighting
Supports RAW
Shoots RAW
Better editing
Viewfinder
Great viewfinder
Digital

galleries

Explore our gallery of 44 sample photos taken by the Kodak Easyshare Z990 MAX.
Explore our gallery of 4 sample photos taken by the Kodak EasyShare Z980.

competitors

Kodak Easyshare Z990 MAX Competitors

Nikon D7200

Nikon D7200

Entry-level DSLR

$789 - $997 body only

$1,100 - $1,297 with 18-140mm lens

Screen resolution Much higher resolution screen
Screen size Significantly larger screen
Image stabilization No image stabilization
Sony CyberShot DSC-H300

Sony CyberShot DSC-H300

Super zoom

$178 - $180

Wide angle Significantly better wide angle
Zoom More zoom
Sensor type Has a CCD-family sensor
Canon PowerShot ELPH 350 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 350 HS

Travel zoom

$199 - $209

Wide angle Significantly better wide angle
Size Significantly smaller
Aperture Significantly narrower aperture

Kodak EasyShare Z980 Competitors

Nikon Coolpix L340

Nikon Coolpix L340

Super zoom

$159

Wide angle Much better wide angle
Size Smaller
Image stabilization No image stabilization
Kodak EasyShare Z981

Kodak EasyShare Z981

Super zoom

Image stabilization Better image stabilization
Zoom Slightly more zoom
External flash No external flash support
Nikon D3300

Nikon D3300

Entry-level DSLR

$452 body only

$399 - $547 with 18-55mm lens

Screen resolution Much higher resolution screen
Autofocus Faster autofocus
Image stabilization No image stabilization

discussion

Kodak Easyshare Z990 MAX
Easyshare Z990 MAX
Kodak

Report a correction
Kodak EasyShare Z980
EasyShare Z980
Kodak

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments