Updated (June 2013): Compare the Kodak PixPro AZ251 vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-LZ20

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LZ20 vs Kodak PixPro AZ251

Winner
Panasonic Lumix DMC-LZ20

44

Kodak PixPro AZ251

42

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix DMC-LZ20

Fast shutter speed
Fastest shutter speed
1/2000 of a second
Built-in flash
Built-in flash
Usually standard
Large screen
Screen size
3"
Great battery life
Battery life
380 shots
 

Reasons to buy the Kodak PixPro AZ251

Battery life
Great battery life
500 shots
Built-in flash
Built-in flash
Usually standard
Screen size
Large screen
3"

galleries

Explore our gallery of 1 sample photo taken by the Kodak PixPro AZ251.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Panasonic Lumix DMC-LZ20.

competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LZ20 Competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ40

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ40

Super zoom

$490

Aperture Wider aperture
Viewfinder Has a viewfinder
Screen resolution Lower resolution screen
Nikon D3200

Nikon D3200

Entry-level DSLR

$289 body only

$419 with 18-55mm lens

Sensor type Has a CMOS-family sensor
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Image stabilization No image stabilization
Canon PowerShot SX410 IS

Canon PowerShot SX410 IS

Super zoom

$192

Zoom More zoom
Wide angle Slightly better wide angle
Battery life Much shorter battery life

Kodak PixPro AZ251 Competitors

Kodak PixPro AZ361

Kodak PixPro AZ361

Super zoom

$208

Fastest shutter speed Much faster max shutter speed
Aperture Wider aperture
Battery life Much shorter battery life
Nikon Coolpix B500

Nikon Coolpix B500

Super zoom

$199 - $257

Fastest shutter speed Much faster max shutter speed
Sensor type Has a CMOS-family sensor
Size Larger
Canon PowerShot SX400 IS

Canon PowerShot SX400 IS

Super zoom

$300

Fastest shutter speed Much faster max shutter speed
Aperture Wider aperture
Battery life Much shorter battery life

discussion

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LZ20
Lumix DMC-LZ20
Panasonic

Report a correction
Kodak PixPro AZ251
PixPro AZ251
Kodak

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments