Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 IV vs GoPro Hero 3+ Black Edition

Winner
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 IV

100

GoPro Hero 3+ Black Edition

67

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 IV

Built-in flash
Built-in flash
Usually standard
High resolution screen
Screen resolution
1,228k dots
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Lens
24p movies
Supports 24p
For that film look
 

Reasons to buy the GoPro Hero 3+ Black Edition

Movie format
Shoots 4K movies
4K @ 12fps
Wide angle
Wide angle lens
5 mm
Size
Really small
Ultra compact (60×42×30 mm)
External mic jack
External mic jack
Record higher quality audio with a microphone

galleries

Explore our gallery of 13 sample photos taken by the GoPro Hero 3+ Black Edition.

competitors

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 IV Competitors

Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II

Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II

Pro digicam

$679

Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
Touch screen Has a touch screen
Movie format Lower resolution movies
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 III

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 III

Pro digicam

$748

External flash Supports an external flash
Battery life Longer battery life
Movie format Lower resolution movies
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V

Pro digicam

$998 - $1,050

Autofocus Faster autofocus
Continuous shooting Shoots faster
Battery life Shorter battery life

GoPro Hero 3+ Black Edition Competitors

Olympus Tough TG-4

Olympus Tough TG-4

Waterproof

$349

Built-in flash Built-in flash
Image stabilization Image stabilization
Movie format Lower resolution movies
GoPro HERO3 Black Edition

GoPro HERO3 Black Edition

Waterproof

Supports 24p Supports 24p
Continuous shooting Shoots much faster
External mic jack Lacks an external mic jack
Nikon AW130

Nikon AW130

Waterproof

$290

Image stabilization Image stabilization
Built-in flash Built-in flash
Movie format Lower resolution movies

discussion

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 IV
Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 IV
Sony

Report a correction
GoPro Hero 3+ Black Edition
Hero 3+ Black Edition
GoPro

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments