Sony Alpha A6000 vs GoPro Hero 3+ Black Edition

Winner
Sony Alpha A6000

95

GoPro Hero 3+ Black Edition

59

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Sony Alpha A6000

Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Lens
Large viewfinder
Viewfinder size
0.70x
Movie continuous focus
Movie continuous focus
Makes it easy to get in-focus movies
Great viewfinder
Viewfinder
Digital
 

Reasons to buy the GoPro Hero 3+ Black Edition

Movie format
Shoots 4K movies
4K @ 12fps
Size
Really small
Ultra compact (60×42×30 mm)
High-speed framerate
High speed movies
240 fps
Thickness
Thin
1.2"

galleries

Explore our gallery of 13 sample photos taken by the GoPro Hero 3+ Black Edition.

competitors

Sony Alpha A6000 Competitors

Sony Alpha a6300

Sony Alpha a6300

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$868 - $898 body only

$978 - $998 with 16-50mm lens

High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies
Weather sealed Weather sealed
Viewfinder size Significantly smaller viewfinder
Sony Alpha A5100

Sony Alpha A5100

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$448 body only

$478 - $498 with 16-50mm lens

Touch screen Has a touch screen
Autofocus Faster autofocus
Image stabilization No image stabilization
Sony Alpha a6500

Sony Alpha a6500

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$1,298 body only

$1,498 - $1,746 with 16-50mm lens

Weather sealed Weather sealed
Touch screen Has a touch screen
Image stabilization Worse image stabilization

GoPro Hero 3+ Black Edition Competitors

Olympus Tough TG-4

Olympus Tough TG-4

Waterproof

$380

Image stabilization Image stabilization
Aperture Wider aperture
Wide angle Much worse wide angle
Nikon AW130

Nikon AW130

Waterproof

$272 - $347

Image stabilization Image stabilization
GPS Has a GPS
Wide angle Much worse wide angle
GoPro HERO3 Black Edition

GoPro HERO3 Black Edition

Waterproof

Supports 24p Supports 24p
Continuous shooting Shoots significantly faster
External mic jack Lacks an external mic jack

discussion

Sony Alpha A6000
Alpha A6000
Sony

Report a correction
GoPro Hero 3+ Black Edition
Hero 3+ Black Edition
GoPro

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments